Combined training (strength plus aerobic) potentiates a reduction in body fat but only functional training reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in postmenopausal women with a similar training load
Fabrício Eduardo Rossi, Ana Claudia S. Fortaleza, Lucas M. Neves, Tiego A. Diniz, Marcela R. de Castro, Camila Buonani, Jorge Mota, Ismael F. Freitas Junior
언어
영어(ENG)
URL
https://www.earticle.net/Article/A304584
※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.
4,000원
원문정보
초록
영어
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of combined (CT; strength plus aerobic) and functional training (FT) on the body composition and metabolic profile with a similar training load in postmenopausal women. The participants were divided into three groups: CT (n= 20), FT (n= 17), and control group (CG, n= 15). The trunk FM, fat mass (FM), percentage of FM (FM%), and fat-free mass were estimated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The metabolic profile, glucose, triacylglycerol, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) were assessed. There were main effects of time in trunk fat, FM, and FM% (P< 0.05). There were statistically significant interaction for FM (P= 0.015), FM% (P= 0.017) with lower values for CT group. For LDL-c, there was significant interaction (P= 0.002) with greater values for FT group in relation to CG and CT. Furthermore, when performed the post hoc test on the “mean absolute differences” (Δ), it can observed statistically significant difference between FT, CT, and CG (-13.0± 16.5 mg/dL vs. 4.8± 18.4 mg/dL vs. 9.2± 18.8 mg/dL, P< 0.05). In conclusion, when training loads are equivalent CT potentiated a reduction in FM and FM%, however, only FT reduced LDL-c in postmenopausal women.
목차
Abstract INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS Subjects Procedures Anthropometric measurements and body composition Blood samples Dietary intake assessment CT procedures FT procedures Session RPE Statistical analysis RESULTS DISCUSSION CONFLICT OF INTEREST REFERENCES
Fabrício Eduardo Rossi [ Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Piaui, Teresina, Brazil, Institute of Bioscience,São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Brazil ]
Corresponding author
Ana Claudia S. Fortaleza [ Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Piaui, Teresina, Brazil ]
Lucas M. Neves [ School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil ]
Tiego A. Diniz [ Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil ]
Marcela R. de Castro [ Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Maranhão (UFMA), São Luis, Brazil ]
Camila Buonani [ Department of Physical Education, University Estadual Paulista, Presidente Prudente, Brazil ]
Jorge Mota [ Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, Porto University, Porto, Portugal ]
Ismael F. Freitas Junior [ Department of Physical Education, University Estadual Paulista, Presidente Prudente, Brazil ]