Earticle

초록

영어

Since the economic reform was launched in China in 1978, the country’s remarkable growth and success have received much attention around the world. Along with this remarkable economic growth, the role of the state, especially that of local governments, in the reform process has been the subject of heated debate. There are two salient perspectives in explaining the role of local governments in the Post-Mao reform period. One is the market transition theory, which have expected local governments to be resistant to changes that threaten their bureaucratic routines or roles and to obstruct the economic reform. The other is local state corporatism, which expects state’s willing to adapt to marketization and expects it to play a pivotal role in local economy. In this paper, I will support the assertion that local corporatism is a better fit for China by analyzing China’s economic dynamics and intuitional consequences. First, I will give a description of market transition theory, and examine its strengths and weakness. Then, I analysis a discussion of local state corporatism and prove that it was a more sensible fit for China.

목차

Abstract
 Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
 Ⅱ. Market Transition Theory
  1. What is Market Transition
  2. Why is the theory plausible to China
  3. Contradictions of market transition theory
 Ⅲ. Local State Corporatism as An Alternative
  1. What is local state corporatism
  2. How does local state corporatism work
 Ⅳ. Implications
 Ⅴ. Conclusion
 References

키워드

저자

• Kim, Wang-Sik [ 김왕식 | 국립공주대학교 행정학과 교수 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  한국지방자치연구

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-0960

• 수록기간

  1995~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 359 DDC 352