Most studies on anaphora resolution have been done not in the discourse but in the sentence, in the generative grammar or formal linguistics. In the computational linguistics, however, many studies on it have been presented in the discourse level. The Centering Theory could be more representative than others. Beaver (2004) have presented a new theory in the perspective of linguistics, called the Centering in Optimality Theory, combining Centering Theory in computational linguistics with Optimality Theory in phonology originally. In this respect, this paper aims to overview, compare, and evaluate two theories, CT and COT. In this paper, we show that the constraints in COT are recognizable from rules and algorithms in CT, and the ordering of constraints in COT is also related to the one of rules in CT. we point out the common and different points between COT and CT. In addition, we discuss some merits and drawbacks of COT, in terms of defeasibility of constraints and processing cost. Finally, we want to say that COT is an anticipated model for discourse anaphora resolution.
목차
I. Introduction II. The Centering Theory 1. Overview of CT 2. Application of CT III. The Centering in Optimality Theory 1. Overview of COT 2. Application of COT VI. Discussions 1. Common points 2. Different Points 3. Defeasibility of Constraints 4. Processing Costs V. Conclusions Works Cited Abstract
한국중앙영어영문학회 [The Jungang English Language And Literature Association Of Korea]
설립연도
1968
분야
인문학>영어와문학
소개
본 학회는 영미어문학의 학술연구와 이에 부합하는 아래의 사업을 기획 수행하며,
또한 회원 상호간의 친목을 도모함을 목적으로 한다.
1. 학회지 발간
2. 연구 발표회, 강연회, 공동연구
3. 영미어문학 관련 도서출판
4. 영미어문학 관계 도서 및 자료의 모집 및 비치
5. 기타 본회의 목적 달성에 필요한 사업
간행물
간행물명
영어영문학연구 [The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature]