Earticle

초록

영어

The diachronic changes of Verb Movement, negation, and the periphrastic DO in English were analyzed in this study. In OE and ME, the main verb moved to INFL or C, but English lost its V-Raising ability in ENE. At the end of the 15th century, the plural marking disappeared in English verb morphology. Consequently, verbs cannot move to INFL in NE. The OE negative particle ne must immediately precede the finite verb. In OE, the emphatic negator noht could occur after the verb to strengthen the preceding ne. In ME, not came to be the regular nonemphatic negator, hence preverbal ne was unnecessary and disappeared. The structure “do x”, which was first introduced by the influence of French faire x in the South-Western dialect in the late 13th century, was argued to be the origin of the periphrastic DO. The grammaticalization of the periphrastic DO was closely related to the loss of V-Raising in ENE. After the loss of V-Raising, the optional DO was grammaticalized as the NE periphrastic DO for negative sentences. When there is no auxiliary verb, DO is inserted under Tense to support the negator not in NE. This is called “DO-Support.”

목차

I. 머리말
 II. 고대.중세영어의 동사이동
 III. 동사이동의 변화
 IV. 부정문
  1. 고대영어의 부정문
  2. 중세영어의 부정문
  3. 현대영어의 부정문
 V. 기능어 DO
  1. 본동사 기원설
  2. 대동사 기원설
  3. 사역동사 기원설
  4. DO X 기원설
 VI. 부정문의 기능어 DO
 VII. 맺음말
 Works Cited
 Abstract

키워드

저자

• 조남호 [ Cho, Nahmho | 한국교통대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  영어영문학연구 [The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-3293

• 수록기간

  1968~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 840 DDC 810