Earticle

초록

영어

Do so anaphora and its Korean counterpart kuleh may be adjoined to VP or vP in the light verb construction (Chomsky 1995). Depictive predicates are secondary predicative adjuncts associated with a verbal projection. Depictive predicates have two varieties: object depictives (ODs) and subject depictives (SDs). Unlike ODs, SDs can be remnants within the context of do so anaphora: SDs are vP adjuncts and ODs are VP adjuncts (Kim 2011). TAs such as on Tuesday adjoin either inside or outside VP. However, the TAs must be adjoined to vP when discourse effects such as contrastiveness or intonation highlighting are given to TAs. Thus, the contrasting TAs are stranded in vP when do so anaphora undergoes VP-anaphorization. The supposed position of the ECMed nominal is the outer spec of vP. There are further paradigms which are explicable only on the assumption that an ECMed element in Korean must be in the upper clause. A sentential adverb adjoined to the matrix vP can be interposed between the ECMed element and the lower predicate, but not between a nominative subject and the lower VP. This testifies that the ECMed element occupies the matrix vP. Kuleh may replace the vP including the ECMed one. It may also replace the matrix non-ECMed VP.

목차

I. Introduction
 II. Previous Researches
  2.1 Kim’s (2011) Analysis in English
  2.2 Previous Analysis in Korean: Chung (2013)
 III. Temporal Adjuncts in English
 IV. Depictives and ECM Construction in Korean
  4.1 Depictives
  4.2 Do So Anaphora in the Korean ECM Construction
 V. Conclusion
 Works Cited
 Abstract

키워드

do so 대용화 예외격표시 목적어묘사술어 주어묘사술어 시간부가어 동사구 경동사구 do so anaphora ECM object depictive subject depictive temporal adjunct VP vP

저자

• Lee, Doo-Won [ 이두원 | Korea National University of Transportation ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물