Earticle

초록

영어

The typology of stress systems shows asymmetries in the directionality of iambic foot paring. Under Optimality Theory, such asymmetries have made some analysts attracted to the asymmetric application of alignment constraints, dispensing with the constraint ALL-FT-R and keeping only the constraint. ALL-FT-L. This study contends that there is a close correlation between the size of minimal feet a language allows for and directionality of alignment constraints cross-linguistically. Focusing on the typology of directionality in unary and binary stress systems, this study tries to show that asymmetric alignment approaches are typologically untenable, considering that the unary systems put top priority on exhaustive foot parsing into prosodic words and as a result, symmetrical foot parsing directionality is indispensable. Binary stress systems showing iambic footing asymmetries, however, place value on achieving eurhythmic goals because the unattested right-aligning iambic patterns include unfavorable initial lapse. Iambic asymmetries are explained by the interaction of *LAPSE constraint with symmetric alignment constraints. The typology of bidirectional stress systems, although they are rarely occur, also gives support to the mutual relation between minimal foot size and alignment directionality.

목차

I. 서론
 II. 음보 정렬과 강세 유형
  2.1 강약격 강세 시스템(Trochaic Stress System)
  2.2 약강격 강세 시스템(Iambic Stress System)
  2.3 양방향 강세 시스템(Bidirectional Stress System)
 III. 선행 연구 고찰 및 제안
  3.1 McCarthy와 Prince(1993): 대칭 정렬 이론
  3.2 Alber(2005): 비대칭 정렬 이론
  3.3 제안: 대칭 정렬 이론과 리듬 제약
 IV. 한 방향 강세 시스템
  4.1 엄격한 2원적 시스템: 방향성 비대칭(Directional Asymmetry)
  4.2 불완전 음보 허용 시스템: 대칭적인 방향성
 V. 양방향 강세 시스템
 VI. 결론
 인용문헌
 Abstract

키워드

저자

• 조혜성 [ Cho, Hyea-Sung | 목포해양대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  영어영문학21 [English21]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1738-4052

• 수록기간

  1967~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 840 DDC 820