Earticle

초록

영어

Academic discussion on the death penalty has never stopped, especially in the "Criminal Law Amendment (eight)", "Criminal Law Amendment (nine)" A lot of the abolition of the death penalty Legal Advisors, the retention or abolition of the death penalty to introducing a small debate upsurge. Radical scholars advocate that the death penalty should be completely abolished, conservative scholars believe that the death penalty should be kept. Through the study of Japanese criminal law on the regulation of the death penalty, it is found that Japan is a country that retains the death penalty, but it is different from China's legal policy and legal tradition. China and Japan in the death of the death penalty, the death penalty execution procedure , the execution of the death penalty and the death penalty in the criminal law system, the status of the problem, there are some differences. Status of the death penalty in Japan has a reference to the correct understanding of the death penalty system in our country, the future development of China's death penalty can be divided into three stages: The first phase, in the physically and procedures strictly limit the death penalty; the second stage, the death penalty into the long-term rarely applicable period; the third stage, the spread of humanitarian become abolitionist core power.

중국어

关于死刑问题的学术讨论从未停止过，特别是在《刑法修正案（八）》、《刑法修正案（九）》大动作地废除死刑刑名后，又将死刑的存废问题引入一个争论小热潮。部分激进派学者主张应彻底废除死刑，部分保守派学者认为应适当保留死刑。通过研究日本刑法关于死刑的规制，发现日本也是保留死刑的国家，但不同于中国的法律政策和法律传统，中日两国在死刑的罪名分布、死刑执行程序限制、死刑的执行主体以及死刑在刑法体系中的地位等问题上都存在一些分歧。日本刑法之死刑现状对中国正确认识死刑制度具有借鉴作用，未来中国死刑的发展可分为三大阶段：第一阶段，在实体与程序上严格限制死刑；第二阶段，死刑进入长期的极少适用时期；第三阶段，人道主义的传播成为废除死刑的核心动力。

목차

摘要
 一. 序言
 二. 中日死刑现状概览
 三. 中日死刑比较分析
 四. 中国死刑的发展方向
 五. 结语
 参考文献
 ABSTRACT

키워드

저자

• 黄辰 [ 황진 | 华东政法大学法律学院. ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  원광법학 [Journal of Law research]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-429X

• eISSN

  2508-4526

• 수록기간

  1962~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 360 DDC 340