The thesis says a study of the replacement possibility about 「wakeda」 & 「hazuda」 and the semantic relation as 「wakeda」 replaces with「hazuda」, vice versa. 「wakeda」is an expression concluding a definite fact and「hazuda」is an expression conjecturing an unrisen or uncertain fact. The two expressions cannot be replaced to do generally, because it’s unnatural if sure judged something is used as conjecture. However, the thesis finds similar cases about the two expressions on the base of assurance. In brief, it’s possible, that the conclusion cases show the conjecture cases. In these cases have the replacement possibility. In case that the relations between P and Q don’t have difference in meaning, 「 wakeda」 & 「hazuda」 can show from a concluded expression to a conjectured expression. A concluded expression and conjectured expression appear subjective judgements. In case to select anything but the results are same, the two expressions are close in meaning. As 「wakeda」&「hazuda」is accepted, it’s possible to exchange each other because the two types are close. The concluding a definite fact and the conjecturing an unrisen or uncertain fact are not close expression. Consequently, there are a little bit similarities. The exchange of 「wakeda」 & 「hazuda」 is characteristic meaning. The exchange of 「wakeda」 & 「hazuda」 that show causes and results and so on has separate meaning.
한국일본언어문화학회 [Japanese Language & Culture Association of Korea]
설립연도
2001
분야
인문학>일본어와문학
소개
본 학회는 일본어학 및 일본문학은 물론, 일본의 정치, 경제, 문화, 사회 등의 일본학 전반에 걸친 연구 및 일본의 언어, 문화를 매체로 한 한국과의 비교 연구를 대상으로 하고 있다. 본 학회는 회원들에게 연구 발표 및 정보 교환의 기회를 부여하고 나아가 한국에서의 바람직한 일본 연구 자세를 확립하는 것을 주된 목표로 하고 있다.