Earticle

현재 위치 Home

A Comparative Study on Participatory Budgeting

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국비교정부학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    한국비교정부학보 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제19권 4호 (2015.12)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.295-315
  • 저자
    Sung-Il Yoon, Dong-Wan Lim, Si-Kyung Seong
  • 언어
    영어(ENG)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A260680

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

원문정보

초록

영어
Participatory budgeting has been spreading in many regions around the world since its adoption. This study is a comparative study utilizing a normative approaches to participatory budgeting as Goldfrank interpreted political contexts connecting with the adoption and development of participatory budgeting. Radical democracy approach and the liberal approach with a positive stance on the adoption of participatory budgeting are analyzed by comparing cases Porte Alegre, Lichtenberg, Chicago City & New York City and Korean local governments According to the radical democracy approach, participatory budgeting is designed to achieve the goal of democratization. With radical democratic approach, the scope of participation extends to broaden the participation of the disadvantaged citizens and to promote citizens' participation in the whole of the budget process, as much as possible and to take advantage of a wide range of intensive and extensive participation. Eventually the local council is likely to lead to conflict of rights. Participatory budgeting by the Liberals has been suggested as a program of government reform, which determined the scope of participation in the direction of ensuring the participation of various members but limited time of participation and scope of the budget. Various methods of citizens' participation in the budget process are established in the participatory budgeting, but they appear limited, especially with the cooperative relationship between local council in the liberal perspective.

목차

Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Participatory Budgeting and Normative Approaches
  1. Participatory Budgeting
  2. Normative Approaches to the Adoption of Participatory Budgeting
 III. Cases of Participatory Budgeting
  1. Porto Alegre of Brazil
  2. Berlin-Lichtenberg of Germany
  3. Chicago City and New York City of United States
  4. Gwangju-Bukgu, Ulsan-Donggu, and Suwon City of Korea
 IV. Comparative Analysis on Participatory Budgeting
  1. Political Context of Participatory Budgeting Adoption
  2. Understanding Participatory Budgeting by Comparative Analysis
 V. Conclusion
 References

키워드

주민참여예산제도 비교연구 비교행정 규범적접근 제도화 Participatory Budgeting Comparative Study Comparative Administration Normative Approach Institutionalization

저자

  • Sung-Il Yoon [ Ph.D. Candidate, Yonsei University ] Main Author
  • Dong-Wan Lim [ Associate Professor, Dankook University ] Co-Author
  • Si-Kyung Seong [ Assistant Professor, Dankook University ] Corresponding Author

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국비교정부학회 [The Korean Association For Comparative Government]
  • 설립연도
    1997
  • 분야
    사회과학>행정학
  • 소개
    본 학회는 중국, 일본, 영·미국 등 각국의 정부체계와 행정을 종합학문적으로 연구하고 한국행정과 관련해 비교론적 차원에서 분석하고, 한국행정을 다각적으로 연구함으로써 한국행정의 발전에 기여함을 목적으로 한다

간행물

  • 간행물명
    한국비교정부학보 [Korean Comparative Government Review]
  • 간기
    연3회
  • pISSN
    1598-964X
  • 수록기간
    1997~2017
  • 십진분류
    KDC 350 DDC 350

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 한국비교정부학보 제19권 4호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장