Earticle

초록

영어

This paper focuses on the intervention of third persons in administrative Litigation. By the way, The details of this are given in the Korea Administrative Litigation Act Article 16. First, the first clause of this Article enacts a provision of the conditions. That is to say, "If there is a third person whose right and interests are infringed by the outcome of a litigation, the court may, upon a request of the party or the third person or ex officio, let the third person intervene in the litigation by decision.". And the second clause of this Article is about a decision. If the court intends to make a decision under paragraph (1), it shall hear in advance the opinions of the party and the third person. Next the third clause of this Article provides for a method of dissatisfaction. And so the third person, who has made a request under paragraph (1), can file an immediate appeal against a decision dismissing his request. Finally with respect to the third person intervening in the litigation under paragraph (1), the provisions of Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act shall apply mutatis mutandis. And Korea Civil Procedure Act Article 67 is the Special Provisions for Indispensable Co-Litigation. Therefore a intervener of administrative Litigation is placed in an equal standing with a intervener of Civil Procedure.

목차

I. 문제의 제기
 II. 소송참가의 요건
 III. 소송참가의 절차
 IV. 소송참가인의 지위
 V. 소송참가의 효과
 VI. 민사소송법의 소송참가와의 관계
 VII. 결어
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

키워드

취소소송 소송참가 보조참가 공동소송적 보조참가 독립당사자참가 공동소송참가 권리 또는 이익의 침해 즉시항고 필수적 공동소송 Revocation Litigation Intervention of Litigation supplementary intervention supplementary intervention alike of co-litigation intervention as independent party intervention into co-litigation infringement of right and interests immediate complaint indispensable co-litigation.

저자

• 강수경 [ Kang, Su-Kyoung | 덕성여자대학교 법학과 교수, 법학박사 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물