Earticle

초록

영어

This study argues that local councilors can enhance their evaluation activities on the local governments by using the qualitative evaluation methodology based on their experiences and insights. The purpose of this study is to suggest that local councilors can be the qualitative researchers in the middle of talk time, speech, interpellation, or audit, and perform qualitative evaluation by gathering qualitative data such as interview, observation, and qualitative literature, and writing field notes. For this, it analyzed the official records of Seoul Metropolitan Council and identified the possibility to introduce and use qualitative evaluation to the local councilors’ activities. In addition, it suggested to use the specific methods such as systemization of evaluative comments, subdivision of evaluation items, and graphing of scorecards. Finally it argued that it require systematic education for local councilors on the qualitative evaluation methodology.

목차

Abstract
 Ⅰ. 문제제기
 Ⅱ. 지방의회의 평가 기능과 질적 평가의 논리
  1. 지방의회의 주요 기능과 질적 평가자로서의 지방의원
  2. 정책평가와 질적 평가
  3. 분석의 틀
 Ⅲ. 서울시의회 의원의 평가 활동
  1. 질문요지서
  2. 질의
  3. 세입세출예산 검토
  4. 행정사무감사
 Ⅳ. 질적 평가의 활용과 도입 방안
  1. 질적 평가 활용 방안
  2. 질적 평가의 도입 방안
 Ⅴ. 결론 및 정책적 제언
 참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 이성우 [ Seong-Uh Lee | 한성대학교 교수 ] 주저자
• 곽병훈 [ Byung-Hun Kwak | 한국학중앙연구원 연구원 ] 공동저자
• 이창언 [ Chang-Eon Lee | 한국방송통신대학교 강의교수 ] 공동저자
• 오수길 [ Soo-Gil Oh | 고려사이버대학교 부교수 ] 교신저자

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  한국비교정부학보 [Korean Comparative Government Review]

• 간기

  연3회

• pISSN

  1598-964X

• 수록기간

  1997~2017

• 십진분류

  KDC 350 DDC 350