Earticle

초록

영어

This study aims to explore differences in the use of linguistic resources to mark engagement between English persuasive text and its Korean translation, and establish valid hypotheses for future studies. To achieve this, it analyzes the ways how engagement markers in a persuasive English text are translated into Korean. Using the 2005 engagement model of Martin & White, this study analyzes a Wall Street Journal opinion text and its Korean translation. First, engagement markers in the ST are identified. Then, the translation of those markers is examined to identify any revealing trends or notable differences. Also the target Korean text is further analyzed using the same engagement model to identify any additional engagement markers that are absent in the source text. The result shows that the linguistic resources to mark engagement in the target text are less varied than those used in its English counterpart. Also, the target text tends to use more engagement markers that are dialogically contracting rather than expanding. The same tendencies are also found in a Korean persuasive text taken from JoongAng Daily. Further analysis may be required to confirm whether the trends hold true in larger samples, and to find out what factors contribute to the tendencies.

목차

 1. 서론
 2. 선행 연구 및 연구 모델
  2.1. 할리데이의 체계기능문법과 AT
  2.2. 분석 모델
 3. 연구방법
  3.1. 분석 텍스트
  3.2. 분석절차
 4. 분석결과
  4.1. 원문 텍스트
  4.2. 번역 기사
  4.3. 한국어 기사
 5. 요약 및 결론
 참고문헌

키워드

참여 체계기능문법 평가어 설득적 텍스트 헤테로글로스 대화주의 engagement systemic functional grammar persuasive text heterogloss dialogism

저자

• 박미준 [ Pak, Mijoon. | 한국외국어대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물