Earticle

초록

영어

The case law has recognized the statutory superficies on custom law in the event of different owners of a land and building due to forced sale by auction for the ownership of the building. In order for the statutory superficies on custom law to constitute, first the owner of a land and building should be identical. In forced sale by auction, provisional seizure may have occurred before the decision to begin the forced sale. Such provisional seizure has an injunctive effect. Therefore, it should be viewed if the owner of land and the owner of building are the same person from the point of provisional seizure. The Supreme Court 2012, 10, 18 Pronouncement 2010Da52140 Decision reviewed in this study, declared that such a foresaid provisional seizure should be the point of judgment. In addition, the Supreme Court 2013, 4 11 Pronouncement 2009Da62059 Ruling stated that if a mortgage was established before seizure or provisional seizure, the mortgage point should be the baseline of judgment. More work will be necessary to further standardize and objectify the requirement to constitute the statutory superficies on custom law.

목차

[사안의 개요]
 Ⅰ. 논점의 정리
 Ⅱ. 관습법상 법정지상권의 성립에 관한 종래 판례 검토
 Ⅲ. 관습법상 법정지상권의 성립여부 판단시점에 관한 대상판결의 검토
 Ⅳ. 맺음말
 참고문헌
 

키워드

저자

• 김덕중 [ Kim, Deok-Jung | 원광대학교 법학전문대학원 부교수, 법학연구소 연구위원, 법학박사, 변호사. ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  원광법학 [Journal of Law research]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-429X

• eISSN

  2508-4526

• 수록기간

  1962~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 360 DDC 340