This study aims to investigate the effects of anonymity of peer feedback on Korean college students’ English writing revision by comparing face-to-face and anonymous feedback. Students took English writing tests and shared written peer feedback according to where the comments are given: in-text, marginal and end-note comment. The acceptance rates of face-to-face and anonymous feedback as well as students’ awareness were analyzed to achieve the purpose. The results are as follows: 1) the amount of anonymous feedback was more than that of face-to-face feedback, especially in-text comment which is mostly comprised of form-focused feedback; 2) in contrast with the amount, students used more face-to-face feedback for their revision and it can be inferred that they regard face-to-face feedback as being more reliable; 3) students responded that both face-to-face and anonymous peer feedback were beneficial to their revision.
목차
I. 서론 II. 이론적 배경 및 선행 연구 III. 연구 방법 A. 연구 대상 B. 연구 절차 C. 연구 자료 D. 자료 분석 방법 IV. 결과 및 논의 A. 연구질문 1의 결과 B. 연구질문 2의 결과 C. 연구질문 3의 결과 V. 결론 참고문헌 Abstract