Earticle

초록

영어

Kim, Dae-Young. 2014. Communication, Argumentation and Relevance. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 39-4, 719-748. The purpose of this paper is to argue that a theory of argumentation can be incorporated into a theory of communication (i.e. Relevance Theory). Whereas argumentation is the process of justifying something in an organized or a logical way, which is composed of one or more claims and shows one or more grounds for maintaining them, communication is sharing communicators’ intentions. A speaker’s conveying of his intention to hearer is to create an effect in the hearer’s mind. Two pragmatic theories, Relevance Theory (henceforth RT) and argumentation theory (henceforth AT) are involved in this approach, which is based on the position that communication is always accompanied with argumentation. However, RT has been more focused on explaining how the utterance is interpreted by the hearer, not how argumentation is performed. For this reason, this approach presented here argues for the needs to extend the scope of RT’s application. This integrated approach within a single principle of relevance ultimately contributes to pursuing a more economic and coherent explanation of argumentation. (Jeonju University)

목차

Abstract
 1. Introduction
  1.1 Argumentation from a Pragmatic Perspective
  1.2 Argumentation and Relevance
  1.3 Cognitive Environment and Relevance
 2. Relevance and Argumentative Concepts
  2.1 Doxa and Topoi as Parts of Cognitive Environment
  2.2 Relevance and Polyphony
 3. The Connection between Doxa, Topoi and Eliciting Implicature by RT
 4. Conclusion
 References

키워드

저자

• Dae-Young Kim [ Jeonju University ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  언어 [Korean Journal of Linguistics]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1229-4039

• 수록기간

  1976~2017

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 710 DDC 195