Earticle

초록

영어

As the movement of performance evaluation prevails in governments and public sector, the more outside evaluators such as professors, accountants and consultants have been involved in the evaluation process. In this respect, we have much doubts whether the evaluators have the evaluation ethics. With these research questions in mind, we aim to review and compare the ethical principles and evaluation standards of USA, UK, France, Canada and Australia. This article shows that evaluation ethics have been adopted to improve the quality and the usefulness of evaluation and the establishment movement led by the evaluation communities of each countries have reflected the professionalization of evaluation. We found evaluation ethics have some limitations, of which the compliance of ethical principles and evaluation standards are most important. In this regard, we propose some recommendations such as improvement of the sensitivity of evaluation ethics, establishment and execution of ethical principle and evaluation standards, institutionalization and enforcement of the ethical program, and professionalization of evaluation. We expect this article would trigger the researches on the evaluation ethics.

목차

Abstract
 Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 평가윤리에 관한 이론적 논의
  1. 평가윤리의 의의
  2. 평가윤리의 기능과 역할
 Ⅲ. 각국의 평가윤리 원칙과 평가표준
  1. 미국
  2. 캐나다
  3. 영국
  4. 프랑스
  5. 호주
 Ⅳ. 평가윤리 원칙 및 평가표준의 특징과 한계
  1. 특징
  2. 한계
 Ⅴ. 결론 및 시사점
 <참고문헌>

키워드

저자

• 한인섭 [ In-Sub Han | 조선대학교 행정복지학부 교수 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  한국비교정부학보 [Korean Comparative Government Review]

• 간기

  연3회

• pISSN

  1598-964X

• 수록기간

  1997~2017

• 십진분류

  KDC 350 DDC 350