Earticle

현재 위치 Home

《일반논문》

통신수단별 감청방안, 감청표준화와 감청규제
Species of wiretapping and wiretapping standardization

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    동국대학교 비교법문화연구원 바로가기
  • 간행물
    비교법연구 바로가기
  • 통권
    제13권 2호 (2013.10)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.165-188
  • 저자
    손태진
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A217141

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

6,100원

원문정보

초록

영어
Modern life are made based on communication and the various law enforcement agencies in crime also damage the eyes being made in secret in the sense that more law enforcement agencies such as the purpose of a criminal investigation, the need for tapping the problem can not be overlooked. In addition, the breadth and speed of the communication of the damage so extensive as to connect with influential national security and foreign inward security is required for the rapid and substantial eavesdropping situation. However, it goes without the consent of the parties of the nature of wiretapping and privacy violations of personal rights , and therefore inevitably a matter of tapping overarching regulation. As seen before , but abroad , tapping equipment is to be operated only by operators and law enforcement agencies of the court's permission to receive such carriers can be provided with the information from eavesdropping and interception by encrypting information using technologies such operators information, as well as anyone can not change, delete, and access to facilities management and related materials for tapping logging as a way to save ever to prevent abuse of wiretapping, especially in this private standards organizations and technical standards established in to be institutionalized as a way to comply with. The effectiveness of wiretapping and interception system of standardized regulations for the law enforcement agencies and the information it provides fast and effective interception, interception records for the people of this nameumeuro lawful interception procedures and whether the interception of information to the public is judged ex post in that it can be self- tapping validity for proper regulation will be able to function as a means. The concept of standardization are tapping discomfort and anxiety that comes from the word itself is beogeoun discussed and it is a fact that, as fast and efficient as this is necessary in situations standardized tapping tapping tapping system that can effectively regulate abuse will be referred to the appropriate means. Suggested keondae various communications system according to the introduction of interception standardized Do will now be reviewed.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 통신수단별 감청 방안
 Ⅲ. 감청표준화
 Ⅳ. 인터넷서비스 감청표준화
 Ⅴ. 기술표준화의 필요성 및 감청규제
 Abstract
 참고문헌

저자

  • 손태진 [ Son tae-jin | 법무법인 선우, 변호사. ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    동국대학교 비교법문화연구원 [The Institute of Comparative Law and Legal Culture]
  • 설립연도
    2000
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    본 연구소에서는 세계 각국의 새로운 법률제도를 그때그때 입수하여 이를 소개하고 한국 실정에 접목가능성을 연구·분석한다. 아울러 본 연구소는 국내의 각종 학술단체, 연구소, 연구기관과의 교류를 증진함은 물론 외국대학의 연구소와 공동연구를 통해 외국의 법문화와 학풍을 소개함으로써 대외적인 학풍선양에도 기여하게 함을 목적으로 한다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    비교법연구 [The Journal of Comparative Law]
  • 간기
    연3회
  • pISSN
    1598-3285
  • 수록기간
    2000~2025
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 비교법연구 제13권 2호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장