Substantial budgets and national energy have invested in consolidation of local government. However, some attempt of consolidation give rise to severe conflict as well as there are few successful consolidation. The purpose of this paper is to find out the efficient ways to promote consolidation of local government in korea by comparison with Japanese consolidation policy. The comparative analysis is conducted by focusing on the policy objectives and backgrounds, policy contents, consolidation process and strategies, performance of consolidation. Japanese local system investigation committee has institutional stability including mayors and local councilors as committee members contrary to korea's promoting committee for local administrative system. Both countries provide similar incentives on consolidation, but in Japan, there is asymmetrical decentralization system. Furthermore, Japanese government changed finance adjustment system on local government to enhance self-reliance. It is turns out that the performance gap between korea's inactive consolidation and Japan's massive consolidation mainly results from institutional differences above mentioned. Therefore, it is required to refer the Japanese case carefully for the Korean successful consolidation policy.
목차
Abstract Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 선행연구 검토 및 분석틀 1. 선행연구 검토 2. 분석을 위한 준거기준 Ⅲ. 지자체 통합정책 비교분석 1. 정책채택: 배경과 목적 2. 정책내용: 전담기구, 통합방식, 통합기준 3. 정책추진: 통합절차, 통합전략, 통합결정 4. 정책성과: 지자체 통합 Ⅳ. 정책 시사점 <참고문헌>
키워드
시·군통합시·정·촌합병한일비교지방행정체제 개편Consolidation of Local GovernmentComparative Study between Korea and JapanReform of Local Administration System