Earticle

현재 위치 Home

『월든』에서 본 소로의 수사적 기예
Thoreau's Rhetoric Arts in Walden

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    대한영어영문학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    영어영문학연구 바로가기
  • 통권
    제28권 제3호 (2002.12)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.109-128
  • 저자
    양병석
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A21043

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

원문정보

초록

영어
The purpose of this paper is to study Thoreau's rhetoric arts, especially in his Walden. Most of the argument of Walden are presented in the first two chapters - ‘Economy’ and ‘Where I Lived and What I Lived for’. The rest of Walden exhibits somewhat a different tone - conciliation and poetic evocation, while maintaining an undercurrent of argument. It is found that paradoxes, word-plays, the creation of personae, audience and narrator ‘I’, the persuasive power by analogy, descriptions in detail, attacking the inconsistencies of foils and etc. are used as the rhetoric tools. By a paradoxical introduction of Walden Thoreau made his readers acquainted with their mode of life; and he let paradoxes present his propositions that he gradually amplified with concrete detail or developed with further propositions. He used argumentative paradoxes along with other rhetoric tools to urge his readers to choose whether the sham of traditional thoughts and the blindness of material civilization, or the communion with spiritual inner-light of self with the simple and serene life. Along with word-plays, they are used to have ‘agreeable surprise’ and ‘vitality’ occur in the readers' mind as well as in his writing, to divert them from the lethargy of conventional thought. He used analogy and satirical attacks of the inconsistencies to lend authenticity to his argument. Thoreau created personae, the well-defined audience synecdochically typified by the men of the conventional civilization and the individual characters as representative sampling of the culture, who serve as foils for the narrator's wit. He also projected himself, the narrator ‘I’ into a persona characterized as a shrewd yankee with good principle, good will and good sense, so that he can be acceptable to the audience, create a rapport with them. By all these means he makes his argument persuasive and credible. And all the rhetorical tools are interrelated one another to serve the purpose to support the paradoxical proposition, ‘the less, the more’, materially poor but mentally rich.

목차

Ⅰ.
 Ⅱ.
 Ⅲ.
 인용문헌
 Abstract

저자

  • 양병석 [ Yang, Pyong-Sok | 원광대 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    대한영어영문학회 [The Association of English Language & Literature in Korea]
  • 설립연도
    1969
  • 분야
    인문학>영어와문학
  • 소개
    본 학회는 영어학 및 영문학 연구 할동과 연구 발표 및 연구 학술지를 발행하고, 교재 개발, 국제학술 교류를 통하여 대한민국의 영어영문학 발전에 기여함을 그 목적으로한다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    영어영문학연구 [Studies on English Language & Literature]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1226-8682
  • 수록기간
    1972~2020
  • 십진분류
    KDC 840 DDC 820

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 영어영문학연구 제28권 제3호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장