현재 위치
Home
연구논문
공정거래법상 부당한 지원행위의 위법성 판단 기준
Standard for Illegality of Unfair Assisting Practices under the Korea Monopoly Regulation Act
-
- 발행기관
- 원광대학교 법학연구소 바로가기
-
- 간행물
- 원광법학 KCI 등재 바로가기
-
- 통권
- 제29집 제4호 (2013.12)바로가기
-
- 페이지
- pp.139-180
-
- 저자
-
- 언어
- 한국어(KOR)
-
- URL
- https://www.earticle.net/Article/A210295
원문정보
초록
- 영어
- Competition policy has political and economic goals. Suppression of economic power concentration resolves a social conflict and helps development of democracy through the regulation of the unfair assisting practices as appears by late hypermarket regulation and supporting with volumes of trade of business conglomerates. The purpose of the monopoly regulation and fair trade act is to promote competition and increase consumer welfare. For market in the form of developing country as Korean market with the high percentage of a large enterprise group and barrier to entry, it could establish fair transaction order to regulate practices, to impede or likely to impede competition process and level playing field For a standard of judgment unfairness of unfair assisting practices, it is desirable to identify in impediment of fair trade, not in factors unrelative to competition such as impediment of corporate transparency, protection of minority shareholders and creditors of supporting firms. Interpreting judgment of unfairness as harm to competition, causes results contrary to legislation purpose by categorize unfair assisting practices into unfair trade practices. Competition law and Antitrust law has multi-dimensional purposes. Unfairness in prohibitive provisions of unfair assisting practices, has to be interpreted as European competition impediment in Korean market that free competition except fair competition, could not be presumed. Fair transaction order has to include level playing field regardless of efficiency and competition process to preserve competition opportunities. Fair transaction order must not consist of only composition element of harm to competitor. Unfairness judgment has to be prudent because revised competition law especially could constrict business activity by over-deterrence to relax a prominence requirement into a favorableness requirement
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 부당한 지원행위 규제 필요성
Ⅲ. 외국의 법규와의 비교
Ⅳ. 부당한 지원행위 성립요건
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
키워드
부당한 지원행위 기업집단 불공정거래행위 경제력집중 내부거래 unfair act of assisting business conglomerates unfair trade practices economic power concentration internal trade저자
간행물 정보
발행기관
-
- 발행기관명
- 원광대학교 법학연구소 [THE LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE WONKWANG UNIVERSTIY]
- 설립연도
- 1961
- 분야
- 사회과학>법학
- 소개
- 법에 대한 이론적 · 실제적 연구를 수행하고 그 결과를 발표하여 한국과 지역사회의 법률문화의 발전에 기여함을 목적으로 설립되었으며 법학일반이론과 법학교육방법 등의 연구와 법률구조안내 및 상담을 한다
간행물
-
- 간행물명
- 원광법학 [Journal of Law research]
- 간기
- 계간
- pISSN
- 1598-429X
- eISSN
- 2508-4526
- 수록기간
- 1962~2026
- 등재여부
- KCI 등재
- 십진분류
- KDC 360 DDC 340
이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 원광법학 제29집 제4호
피인용수 : 0건 (자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)
함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.
출처 : 네이버학술정보
0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.