Earticle

초록

영어

Both Kim Suyoung and Beidao worked actively as the poets of the people and also modernism during the 1960’s to 80’s. And they had some things in common as both of them were born before or after the national independence, belonged to the class of intellects, and were representative poets of the people and modernism symbolizing the 1960’s to 1970’s. Not abandoning their aspects as modernists, they properly utilized metaphor, symbol, the alteration of view, or montage technique and destroyed the order of time and space to realize poems of participation in their own ways differentiated from those used by other poets to write their poems of the people. Moreover, their poems are not confined in the trend of ‘modernism’, but still show the aspects connected with reality by accepting conventional modernism creatively as well as critically. These poets who were the subjects of resistance during the 1960 to 80’s in Korea and China separately had to adopt some other way differentiated from the former. For instance, Korean poets of the people including Kim Suyoung changed from individual-oriented discourse to people-oriented discourse while Chinese resistant poets like Beidao converted from ‘the people’-oriented socialistic community discourse to individual-oriented discourse against the former. Both of them did open the first door to resistance by forming the subject in a different way from what their own national system adopted.

목차

1. 서론
 2. 저항담론의 방식-주체의 대응양상 비교
 3. 저항의 일상성에 대한 비교
 4. 결론
 참고문헌
 논문초록

키워드

참여시 주체 모더니즘 리얼리즘 저항 일상성 Resistant Poems independence Modernistic realism resistance Allteglichkeit.

저자

• 이미옥 [ Lee, Mi-Ok | 서울대학교 국어국문학과 박사수료 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물