The House of Peers in Meiji Constitution was considered to make control to a political party into a role. For this reason, to the party cabinet, it was very hostile to the degree.However, since different character from equivalent authority was the feature, for the stable political power management, both harmony was required for the bicameral system under Meiji Constitution. The House of Peers reform was going to solve this problem by establishing supremacy of the House of Representatives. The point that give recognition to a role of the House of Peers has the characteristic of the reform theory of this time. However, as for the argument, a party cabinet was a premise. In other words, it was the logic not to let the House of Peers participate in politics. The House of Peers reform theory transferred a role of the House of Peers. However, the postwar new constitution gave powerful authority to the House of Representatives. Therefore, the role theory of the Upper House to control the reckless driving of the political party was reevaluated as an important problem. This had a big influence on House of Councilors system.
한국일본근대학회 [The Japanese Modern Association of Korea]
설립연도
1999
분야
인문학>일본어와문학
소개
본 학회는 한국, 일본의 문학 및, 어학, 문화, 사상, 역사 등 여러 분야의 연구자 및 대학원생의 연구성과에 관한 자유로운 발표, 토론을 통해 학문발전과 학술교류를 행하고자하는 목적에서 설립되었다.
따라서 본 회는 이러한 목적을 달성하기 위해 학술연구발표회 및 연구회와 학술지 발간, 국내외 관련 학계와의 학술교류, 관련정보의 구축 및 제공 등의 사업을 실시하고 있다.
간행물
간행물명
일본근대학연구 [ILBON KUNDAEHAK YUNGU ; The Journal of Korean Association of Modern Japanology]