Subrogation action by an obligee is a lawsuit where a person, holding the subrogation right of the obligee under civil law, files a lawsuit by right of subrogation. According to civil law, subrogation action by an obligee recognizes the obligee to hold the right of performing the litigation of existence and nonexistence on behalf of the original right holder, the obligor; thus it is acknowledged that the obligee is holds a statutory standing in such case. As far as the legal nature of subrogation action by an obligee is understood as the litigant with statutory standing, it is appropriate to consider that the existence of claim to preservation is related to the existence of standing and is applicable to the requirements for litigation. Therefore, in case an obligee without claim to preservation files a subrogation action, the action is considered unlawful as it does not hold a standing. When a subrogation action (competition of subrogation action) filed independently by multiple obligees or pendency of a lawsuit filed by an obligee or an obligor, in case an obligor or an obligee files a lawsuit later, the later and previous lawsuits become duplicate lawsuits because the litigants or subject matters of each action are the same. During the pendency of a subrogation action by an obligee filed without claim to preservation, a defect occurs between standing (previous lawsuit) and duplicate (later lawsuit) lawsuits and the two compete as another obligee with claim to preservation each files a lawsuit later against the same obligor.As a solution to resolve the competition of defect between standing and duplicate lawsuits due to a lack of claim to preservation, in principle, the principle of investigation order for litigation requirements must be applied. However, in cases where the practical resolving of the conflict or the protection of practical obligee is violated, the application of such principle must be limited; in such case, this study suggests a solution that can resolve the conflict and protect the obligee.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 피보전채권과 당사자적격 Ⅲ. 채권자대위소송과 중복소송 Ⅳ. 당사자적격의 흠결과 중복소송의 경합 및 그 해결 방안 V. 맺음말 참고문헌 Abstract
키워드
채권자대위소송피보전채권당사자적격중복소송소송요건subrogation action by an obligeeclaim to preservationstandingduplicate lawsuitlitigation requirements
전북대학교 동북아법연구소 [Institute for North-East Asian Law]
설립연도
2007
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
전북대학교 동북아법연구소는 동북아법에 관한 국내외의 이론과 실제를 연구하고 교육하며, 그 결과를 발표하여 동북아법에 대한 이해의 증진과 동북아의 법률문화발전에 기여하기 위한 목적으로 2006년 7월 설립되었다.
서해안시대의 중심지역을 표방한 전라북도의 지리적 여건과 동북아시아의 여러 국가와의 인적 물적 교류가 확대되면서 그에 따른 여러 가지 법률문제가 발생됨에 따라 동북아시아의 지역적 특성을 고려한 법제도의 연구와 이들 국가와 거래하는 전북지역 자치단체와 기업에 대한 실질적 교육의 필요성이 대두되었다.
이러한 요청에 따라 법제도의 연구와 교육을 담당할 기관으로 전북지역 거점국립대학인 전북대학교가 동북아법연구소를 설립하게 되었고 전북 지방자치단체와 기업에 대한 교육과 자문프로그램을 운영하고 있다.