Earticle

초록

영어

The purpose of this study was to examine the differences of governmental countermeasures depending on the acknowledgement of policy dilemma conditions under the policy dilemma situations. It especially compared the countermeasures of Rho Moo Hyun government with those of Lee Myung Park ' s toward non-regular employment laws. The results were shown that two governments had differential countermeasures when making or amending non-regular employment laws. Rho's government discussed non-regular employment issues in his early official years and succeeded to make them the laws under President Rho's governmental management philosophy and with his powerful leadership. On the other hand, Lee's government has failed to amend them. In the process of amendment, it has finally realized the dilemma of non-regular employment laws. The policies, however, have shown inconsistencies. The major findings of the study based on the results were as follows: First, the governmental policy dilemmas could be led by a governmental management philosophy or social environments. Second, a governmental management philosophy could change roles of labor- management-government. Third, the governmental policy dilemmas could be caused by interest-related groups' effects. Last, the longer we discussed non-regular employment laws, the more the dilemma was reinforced.

목차

Abstract
 Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 분석의 틀
  1. 사회적 갈등과 정책 딜레마 상황
  2. 정책과정의 접근법으로서 정책딜레마 모형
  3. 분석의 틀
 Ⅲ. 비정규직 보호법을 둘러싼 정책딜레마 형성 및 전략 분석
  1. 비정규직 보호법 개요
  2. 노무현 정부의 정책과정 분석
  3. 이명박 정부의 정책과정 분석
 Ⅳ. 두 정부의 정책과정 비교분석
  1. 맥락의 변화: 국정운영철학
  2. 두 정부의 정책딜레마 상황
  3. 정부 대응전략의 차이
 Ⅴ. 결론
 참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 현승현 [ Seung-Hyun Hyun | 고려대학교 정부학연구소 연구원 ] 주저자
• 김선엽 [ Seon-Yeop Kim | 경희사이버대학교 행정학과 교수 ] 교신저자

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  한국비교정부학보 [Korean Comparative Government Review]

• 간기

  연3회

• pISSN

  1598-964X

• 수록기간

  1997~2017

• 십진분류

  KDC 350 DDC 350