Earticle

초록

영어

There has been somewhat vehement dispute among so-called radical ecologies, especially between social ecology and deep ecology, on allegedly eco-fascist and misanthropic tendencies found in a number of writings and words of some deep ecological scholars and activists. For social ecologists, being led by Murray Bookchin, the founder of social ecology, deep ecology adheres to the same reactionary, antihumanistic, romantic, and irrational assumptions that presaged National Socialism and that are discernable in the work of Heidegger, the former Nazi. I think that social ecologists' attacks on deep ecology are largely unfair. But, it seems that we may get a very precious lesson from the dispute. Confronting the era of ecological crisis, we are apt to appeal to authoritarian measures to overcome it. To avoid such danger, we must do thoughtful self-examination and close listening to the criticism before jumping to hasty conclusions.

목차

Abstract:
 1. 서론
 2. 파시즘， 나치즘， 생태파시즘
 3. 생태파시즘 논쟁의 계기
 4. 논쟁의 쟁점
  4.1 신멜서스주의와 인간혐오주의
  4.2 낭만적 자연신비주의
  4.3 전일주의적 환경윤리관과 부족주의
  4.4 심층생태학의 선구자로서 하이데거
 5. 심층생태학은 진정 생태파시즘인가?
 6. 논쟁에 대한 성찰
 참고문헌

키워드

사회생태학 심층생태학 생태파시즘 에코파시즘 자연숭배 자연신비주의 반인간주의 인간혐오 social ecology deep ecology eco-fascism nature worship nature mysticism antihumanism misanthropy

저자

• 송명규 [ Song, Myung-gyu | 단국대학교 도시계획 및 부동산학부 교수 ] 단독저자

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물