Earticle

초록

영어

The following five hypotheses are to be examined in this paper: “Interpreting competence is not innate” “In interpreting competence, it is better to acquire a past so-called ‘critical period’ for language acquisition”, “The process of interpreting acquisition has certain steps that are the same, regardless of the language pair and the learner”, “Foreign language proficiency does not necessarily mean interpreting proficiency”, and “There are gender differences in the interpreting acquisition.” Some of these hypotheses have been regarded as near-facts among those who learn and teach interpreting(‘Interpreters are not made but born’). To verify or falsify these hypotheses on a more objective basis, recent scientific results from cognitive psychology and neuropsychology are consulted, especially neuroscientific researches are drawn on to support most of the above hypotheses. The explanations that this paper offers can be a theoretical construct for future empirical researches which need to be carried out in cooperation between interpreting researchers and neuropsychologists.

목차

 1. 들어가며
 2. 인지심리학 및 신경심리학, 양면적 접근의 필요성
 3. 통역에 대한 다섯 가지 가설
  3.1. 통역사는 타고난다?(통역능력은 반드시 선천적이라고 볼 수 없다.)
  3.2. 통역은 사춘기(언어습득의 결정적 시기) 이전에 배워야 한다?(통역의 적정 습득시기는 언어습득의 결정적 시기와 다르다.)
  3.3. 통역을 배울 때에는 개인차가 심하다?(통역습득에는 일정한 단계가 있다.)
  3.4. 외국어를 잘하는 사람이 꼭 통역을 잘하는 것은 아니다?(외국어 능력과 통역 능력은 다르다.)
  3.5. 여자가 남자보다 통역을 잘 한다?(통역능력에 남녀 성별차가 존재할 수 있다.)
 4. 나가며
 참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 정혜연 [ Chung, Hye-yeon | 충남대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  통번역학연구 [Interpreting and Translation Studies]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1975-6321

• eISSN

  2713-8372

• 수록기간

  1997~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 717 DDC 400