Earticle

현재 위치 Home

외국어로서의 한국어 교재 개발에서의 번역 양상 문제
Issues in translation aspect of the textbook development of Korean as a Foreign language

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국외국어대학교 통번역연구소 바로가기
  • 간행물
    통번역학연구 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제16권 1호 (2012.02)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.39-64
  • 저자
    김재욱
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A168103

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

6,400원

원문정보

초록

영어
This study investigates aspects of the translation of beginning-level Korean language textbooks and analyzes the translations in terms of glocalization. The textbooks have been developed for use at King Sejong Institutes all around the world and are translated into English, Japanese, Chinese, Mongolian, Thai, Russian, and Spanish. For this, I asked seven Korean language teachers who have professional language abilities in each language or majored in the language to translate the textbook from Korean as literally as possible. I also asked them to analyze its tone and nuances in each language. As I analyzed these materials, I also asked professionals in each language (professors who majored in each language) and native speakers to verify or confirm my questions. Through this, I classified sections of the translations in terms of literal and liberal translation, as well as analyse what different aspects the translations have according to each language. As I examine the general pattern of the translation, Anglicisms are found in many other language versions. This is, in part, due to the fact that the English version was developed first, and other language versions were developed later based on the English. Additionally, each translation has its own style. Among these, the Japanese textbook is translated liberally to help Japanese-speaking students understand easily. Similar strong points are found in the Chinese translation, but not in the terminology. Terms that are nonexistent in Japanese or Chinese are translated ambiguously. This would imply point to a need to develop proper educational terms. In the Mongolian version, the translation is liberal and, for the most part, was not translated from the English version into Mongolian. Instead, the proper Mongolian lexicon was used to help students understand well. Hopefully the result of the analysis in this study will be helpful for translation of glocal Korean Language textbooks used at the King Sejong Institute.

목차


 1. 서론
 2. 세종학당 한국어 교재 개발 현황
 3. 한국어 교재의 외국어별 번역 양상
  3.1. 연구 조사 방법
  3.2. 교재에서 사용된 지시 용어의 번역 양상
  3.3. 교재 지문에서의 번역 양상
 4. 각 언어별 교재에서의 번역 양상
 5. 결론
 참고문헌

저자

  • 김재욱 [ Kim, Jae-Wook | 한국외국어대학교 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국외국어대학교 통번역연구소 [Interpreting and Translation Research Institute, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies]
  • 설립연도
    1997
  • 분야
    인문학>통역번역학

간행물

  • 간행물명
    통번역학연구 [Interpreting and Translation Studies]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1975-6321
  • eISSN
    2713-8372
  • 수록기간
    1997~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 717 DDC 400

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 통번역학연구 제16권 1호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장