Earticle

초록

영어

In this paper, I explain what restrictions are imposed on sentences with '-kilay' and why. To do this, sentences with '-kilay' are grouped into three by mood. In declaratives ending with '-ta', '-kilay' means perceiving or realizing some situation in the antecedent clause, and the event of perceiving/realizing provides an occasion for the volitional action of the agent in the consequent clause. In questions and sentences ending with '-ci', '-kilay' does not show the properties that it shows in declaratives. It does not have the meaning of occasion, but that of reason, between the antecedent and consequent clauses. The relation of reason needs one agent who imposes it. always the hearer in questions. In sentences ending with '-ci', however, it needs two agents, one for the epistemic operator '-ci' and the other for the agent who imposes a relation of reason. They may not be the speaker, in which case inference gets involved. In all three, '-kilay' does not have narrower scope than other semantic operators

목차

Abstract
 1. 서론
 2. 이전의 연구에 대한 비판적 고찰
 3. '-길래'와 서법
  3.1. 직설법 평서문에서의 '-길래'의 의미와 화용
  3.2. '-거든'과의 유사성과 차이
  3.3. 의문법 문장에서의 '-길래'의 의미와 화용
  3.4. 서상법 문장에서의 '-길래'의 의미와 화용
 4. 결론
 참고문헌

키워드

-길래 계기 이유 지각 인지 서법 -kilay occasion reason perception congnitive mood

저자

• 염재일 [ Jae-Il Yeom | 홍익대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물