Earticle

초록

영어

Government officials's appeals are controlled by Central Appeals Commission and Local Government officials's appeals are controlled by Local Appeals Commissions which are installed in the Province or City. We can know the below three things after examining the results of both Appeals Commissions' determination from 2006 to 2010. First, there was a big deviation in the rate of relief. Second, there was also a big deviation in the determination about the type of similar illegal activities. Third, there is also a deviation in the rate of relief among 16 Local Appeals Commissions. This problem generates because controlling function in Province is insufficient. In other words, the tendency to be generous toward the Local Government officials can occur because disciplinary punishment and appeal affairs are controlled by the same Province. Like the illegal and unfair administrative measure is judged by the Administrative Appeals Commission as a higher-level office and an independent adjudicator, appeals judging as a kind of administrative judgement should also be carried out by higher-level office or an independent adjudicator. It is the best way to promote the objectivity and fairness of judgement. So I propose the jurisdiction problem between Central and Local Appeals Commission and the establishment of Appeals Judgement Law.

목차

Abstract
 Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
 Ⅱ. 이론적 논의 및 선행연구 검토
  1. 소청심사제도의 의의
  2. 행정심판과 연관성
  3. 선행연구 검토 및 분석 초점
 Ⅲ. 소청심사기관의 제도·운영현황과 심사결정 분석
  1. 중앙과 지방소청심사기관의 제도·운영현황
  2. 중앙·지방 소청심사기관의 심사결정 분석
 Ⅳ. 우리나라 소청심사기관의 발전적 과제
  1. 제도 및 운영상 과제
  2. 심사결정상 과제
 Ⅴ. 결론 및 정책적 제언
 참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 한봉기 [ Bong-Kee Hahn | 소청심사위원회 상임위원 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  한국비교정부학보 [Korean Comparative Government Review]

• 간기

  연3회

• pISSN

  1598-964X

• 수록기간

  1997~2017

• 십진분류

  KDC 350 DDC 350