Earticle

초록

영어

This is to study Jo Sik’s false accusation against Gim Ju in July 1477. The incident stirred up the court of king Seongjong over about ten days. It was an interesting case because the accuser and the accused got punished together. Jo Sik charged Gim Ju with unlawful marriage to his widowed sister, but he also received punishment on charges of making a false accusation. Gim Ju and his wife, Mrs. Jo, couldn’t avoid the penalty for violation of fornication inhibition law of Ta Ming Lu(大明律), although he marriaged her many years after her husband had died and it was a custom at that time. This odd verdict came from the special circumstance that both sides were equally descendants of prestigious families and, at the same time, close relatives of those in power, then Seongjong hesitated to rule in favor of either of both sides. The case was more interesting in that it involved all the complicated political and social situation in those days. In fact it was the cause of the king’s order, directly after the incident, that sons and grandsons of yangban women who remarried could not serve in government office, and which was, in turn, a forerunner to the law of 1484 to prohibit government service against sons and grandsons of remarried yangban women. Therefore the Jo Sik and Gim Ju case is the key to understand the order of 1477 and the law of 1484 correctly.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
 Ⅱ. 사건의 顚末과 관련 인물의 정치적ㆍ사회적 배경
 Ⅲ. ‘조식· 김주 무고사건’ 의 영향과 再嫁女所生관직제한법
 Ⅳ. 맺는말
 Abstract
 참고문헌

키워드

조식·김주 무고사건 재가녀자손관직제한법 재가금지 대명률 화간률 과부 계유정난 Jo Sik and Gim Ju Calumny Incident law to prohibit government service against sons and grandsons of remarried yangban women prohibition of remarriage against yangban women Ta Ming Lu fornication inhibition law widow Coup of Prince Suyang in 1453 Gyeyujeongnan

저자

• 최윤진 [ Choi, Yun-jin | 호남권 한국학자료센터 연구원. ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물