Pay-what-you-want pricing mechanisms have become increasingly popular among arts organizations. However, most of the current research has only examined strategies in which consumers are allowed to choose any price with no guidance from the organization. Organizations are currently using several external reference price strategies to influence consumers’ chosen prices in pay-what-you-want pricing, including minimum, maximum, and suggested prices. This research examines the effectiveness of these different strategies to determine which strategy provides the highest yield and the most benefit to the organization. Across three studies, we find that these external reference prices act as anchors, biasing consumers’ chosen prices in the direction of the anchor. We further find that both minimum and maximum prices can have a negative influence on consumers’ chosen prices, while a suggested price strategy appears to be the most effective way to maximize the organization’s yield while giving consumers the freedom to choose their own price.
목차
Abstract THEORETICAL FOUNDATION STUDIES Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 DISCUSSION REFERENCES
한국문화예술경영학회 [Korean Society of Arts and Cultural Management]
설립연도
2008
분야
예술체육>예술일반
소개
본 회는 문화예술경영학을 중심으로 한 연구, 조사, 교육, 기획, 발표 및 보급을 통하여 한국에서의 문화예술경영학의 학문적 성과를 이루며, 나아가 문화예술계 현장과의 결합을 통해 한국 문화예술의 질적 향상과 향수권 확대를 도모함으로써 문화예술경영학의 발전과 국제경쟁력 강화에 기여함을 목적으로 한다.
간행물
간행물명
문화예술경영학연구 [Journal of Arts and Cultural Management]