Earticle

초록

영어

This paper investigates Partial Agreement (PA, agreement with only one conjunct of a coordinated noun phrase), drawing on data from Russian. Russian is an interesting case because it arguably has two types of coordination: conjunctive.(i 'and') coordination, and comitative (s 'with') coordination. PA is shown to be grammatical only with the first type. Evidence is presented that deriving instances of PA from underlying clausal coordination plus ellipsis/deletion (Aoun, Benmamoun & Sportiche 1994, 1999) is not tenable for Russian. The uniclausal configurational position approach of Munn (1993, 1999), however, makes the correct predictions. Further data which seem to favor the clausal coordination account are resolved by adopting certain assumptions about the structure of group predicates. These assumptions also allow us to explain the unavailability of PA with comitative coordination.

목차

 1. Introduction  2. Background on Russian agreement and basic facts about PA
 3. Previous analyses of PA
 3.1 Configurational position approach
 3.2 Conjunct size approach: Aoun, Benmamoun, & Sportiche (1994), (1999)
 4. Evidence against the clausal coordination analysis
 5. Conflicting evidence and a speculation on how to resolve it
 6. Conclusion
 References

키워드

등위구조 동질성 명사구 집합술어 러시아어 partial agreement coordination comitative noun phrases group predicates Russian

저자

• Rebecca Shields

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물