The purpose of this study is to find out the limit of self defense and the solution of competition. It is impossible for us to admit self defense without limit in actuality of criminal law if we take adequate notice of the benefit and protection of the law, the principle of propriety, and the principle of present. Taking this opportunity of this problems, went deep into the study of competition of justifications and security of effectiveness about self help in the criminal law of Korea. The results show that as follow: Firstly, the question of whether or not to admit self defense, is determined by the special feature by means of advance emergency act. It is impossible to shirk one's criminal responsibility about a revenge act. Secondly, we must not only know the difference between self defense and self help in the criminal justifications, but also judge by the standard under a special feature of the mutual supplementation which overcome weakness. This study shows how we will decide a standard of justifications between self defense and self help. Thirdly, we have to make full use of the self help by justification in a judicial precedent, because the self help is a fort which protect a claim, especially property right, from violation.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 1. 정당방위의 위상 2. 연구의 목적 및 범위 Ⅱ. 정당방위의 몇 가지 문제점 1. 보호법익의 범위의 문제 2. 상당성의 문제 3. 현재성의 문제 Ⅲ. 형법 제23조 자구행위의 중요성 1. 기본적 사상 2. 체계내의 위치와 정당방위와의 경합 3. 자구행위의 독자성 Ⅳ. 결론 참고문헌 논문초록
키워드
정당방위자구행위위법성조각사유경합청구권재산권Self defenseSelf help. JustificationCompetitionClaimProperty right
동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
설립연도
2000
분야
복합학>학제간연구
소개
동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.