Earticle

현재 위치 Home

유토피아의 두 흐름
Two Trends of Utopianism

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    순천대학교 남도문화연구소 바로가기
  • 간행물
    남도문화연구 바로가기
  • 통권
    제14권 (2008.06)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.9-26
  • 저자
    김영한
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A140634

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

5,200원

원문정보

초록

영어
The types of utopias can be variously divided according to the criteria of classification : for example, a static utopia vs. a dynamic utopia, an abstract utopia vs. a concrete utopia, the
utopia of escape vs. the utopia of hope, an individual utopia vs. a collective utopia, an ascetic utopia vs. a want-satisfying utopia, etc. However, the most focal types of utopias are the
utopia of equality and the utopia of liberty. In the early-modern world, Thomas More was a representative of utopians who supported a utopia of equality, whereas Francis Bacon dreamed of a utopia of liberty and affluence. While More conceived of a self-sufficient society by limiting
the human nature, Bacon attempted to construct a society which could satisfy human desires by increasing production. It was the Utopian Socialists of the nineteenth century who tried to reconcile equality with liberty. They tried to build up a society of equality through social systems on the one hand. On the other hand, they also tried to realize a liberal and affluent society through scientific technology. Unfortunately, they did not succeed, as equality and liberty are conflicting values. Where there is liberty, competition and inequality are unavoidable, and where equality is emphasized, liberty is bound to be limited. Then, what is the third way that can transcend the conflict between liberty and equality? It is, I believe, a utopia of fraternity. If liberty and equality are based on the principle of self-love, which focuses on preservation of one's own self, fraternity is based on the principle of altruism, which focuses on the solidarity of the self and others. Thus, Jules Michelet asserted that “fraternity is the realization-transcendence of
liberty and equality”, presupposing that “without the prerequisites of liberty and equality, there could be no fraternity.” In this context, it is expected that the ideal society we should aim for will be the society which is based on the principle of fraternity.

목차

1. 이상사회의 두 유형
 2. 유토피아의 범주
 3. 유토피아의 전통
 4. 자유/평등의 유토피아에서 박애의 유토피아로
 5. 나머지 말
 Abstract

키워드

Cockaigne Arcadia Millennium Utopia Utopia of Liberty Utopia of Equality Utopia of Fraternity

저자

  • 김영한 [ Kim, Young-Han | 서강대 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    순천대학교 남도문화연구소 [The Jirisan Region Culture Research Inatitute, Sunchon National University]
  • 설립연도
    1986
  • 분야
    인문학>역사학
  • 소개
    호남지방 및 남해안 지역의 향토문화를 조사ㆍ연구함으로써 지방 문화의 계승과 발전을 도모하며 민족 문화의 창달에 이바지 하기 위하여 여러 가지 사업을 수행한다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    남도문화연구 [The Centre for Namdo Culture]
  • 간기
    연3회
  • pISSN
    1975-826X
  • 수록기간
    1994~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 911 DDC 951

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 남도문화연구 제14권

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장