Earticle

현재 위치 Home

판례 평석

배아연구와 인간의 존엄과 가치 - 헌재 2010.5.27. 선고, 2005헌마346 전원재판부 결정에 대한 검토 -
The Debate on Human Embryo Research and Human Dignity(Human Right to Life) - The Constitutional Court Decision on May. 27. 2010, case no. 2005 heonma 346 -

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    원광대학교 법학연구소 바로가기
  • 간행물
    원광법학 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제27집 제1호 (2011.03)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.243-270
  • 저자
    서종희
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A139648

원문정보

초록

영어
One of the understanding the latest issues in bioethics is stem cell research used embryos, which is being discussed intensely in society from all corners of the earth.
Embryos are used in various techniques of assisted reproductive technology, such as in vitro fertilization and embryo donation. They may be subject to embryo cryopreservation for later use if IVF procedures have resulted in more embryos than is currently needed. Some aspects, e.g. selective reduction in the beginning of pregnancy have triggered a moral debate, because prenatal diagnosis or preimplantation diagnosis involves testing embryos for diseases or conditions.
At the same time, human embryos are being researched to determine their use in treating diseases. Stem cell research, reproductive cloning, and germline engineering are all currently being explored. The morality of this research is also debated because an embryo is commonly sacrificed. That is to say, this research cannot be divorced from ethical problems since it requires the destruction of eggs of fertilized eggs. Lively debates have been held over which should be more respected, freedom of research or human dignity(the right to life of embryo). Some insist that a human embryo can't have the right to life and human dignity since it is not considered viable organism, because it cannot survive outside the uterus. Others say that though embryo has the right to life or the human dignity, the human dignity and embryo research are compatible.
Recently, many nations said “yes” to human embryonic stem cell research, signing an executive order to permit funding for the research in the mame of achieving health and life of humankind. However human dignity and mankind’'s diversity attacked by an indiscreet research which is such an important characteristic of the ‘'human status’' would become meaningless, that is, it is a threat to human existence. After all, though we allow to do research embryo, we should control the capacity of abuse of embryo research for human dignity.
Also we must always be careful of violating of human dignity in that there is still eugenical discrimination by embryo research through the creation of human iPS (induced Pluripotent Stem cells) and artificial abortion in use of PGD(preimplatation genetic diagnosis).

목차

I. 들어가는 말
 II. 대상결정에 대한 기본적 이해
 III. 생명윤리법 제17조에 대한 대상결정 분석
 IV. 생명윤리법 제16조에 대한 대상결정 분석
 V. 맺는말
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

키워드

배아연구 배아의 법적 지위 생명권 인간의 존엄과 가치 생명윤리법 헌재 2010.5.27. 선고 2005헌마346 전원재판부 결정 줄기세포 연구 Human Embryo Research Legal Status of the Embryo The Right to Life of Embryo Human Dignity Stem Cell research Bioethics & Biosafety Act The Constitutional Court Decision on May. 27. 2010 case no. 2005 heonma 346.

저자

  • 서종희 [ Seo, Jong-Hee | 연세대학교 법학연구소 연구위원, 연세대학교 대학원 법학과 박사과정수료(민법 전공) ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    원광대학교 법학연구소 [THE LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE WONKWANG UNIVERSTIY]
  • 설립연도
    1961
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    법에 대한 이론적 · 실제적 연구를 수행하고 그 결과를 발표하여 한국과 지역사회의 법률문화의 발전에 기여함을 목적으로 설립되었으며 법학일반이론과 법학교육방법 등의 연구와 법률구조안내 및 상담을 한다

간행물

  • 간행물명
    원광법학 [Journal of Law research]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1598-429X
  • eISSN
    2508-4526
  • 수록기간
    1962~2025
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 원광법학 제27집 제1호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장