Earticle

현재 위치 Home

연구논문

유럽연합의 민주주의 결여 극복 노력의 함의
European Union's effort to overcome Democratic Deficit

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    원광대학교 법학연구소 바로가기
  • 간행물
    원광법학 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제27집 제1호 (2011.03)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.173-202
  • 저자
    김용훈
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A139646

원문정보

초록

영어
Ostensibly, as European Union is not possessed of it own territory and people, it is difficult to say that the Union has the sovereignty of its own. Even though it is announced that European Union is possessed of sovereignty in Costa v. ENEL, the transfer of sovereignty declared on the case is just based on a limitation of sovereignty or a transfer of powers. Furthermore the transfer of sovereignty is possibile on the premise of the consent of Member States in European Union. Thus it should be noted that European Union is not possessed of its own initiative in proceeding the integration of European Union. Of course European Union is to be evaluated as the sui generis entity on the ground that it obtains various characteristics in integration such as its own legal order, de facto power of separation, the system of judicial review and the concept of Citizenship etc. Nonetheless European Union has a great deal of difficulties in its own integration considering the opinion of German federal constitutional court(Budesverfassungsgerichtbarkeit) that the Member States are the authentic Masters of Treaties(Herren der Verträge) rather that the European Union.
In spite of these difficulties in integration, European Union has not forsaken the purpose and willingness for integration especially considering its trial for the Treaty for European Union establishing Constitution. Even though the trial was failed, European Union has not still abandoned the purpose and willingness for integration with a focus of the power of European Parliament. In other words European Union has reinforced the power(legislative power) of European Parliament from its outset. And European Union has tried to enhance the power of European Parliament at Lisbon Treaty such as co-decision procedure(TFEU Article 289, Article 294), election of the President of the Commission(Article 17), the power of regulation(Article 290) and the power of budget(TFEU Article 314) etc. Taking into consideration of those aspects concerning the power of European Parliament, it is postulated that European Union tried to reinforce its own democratic legitimacy. Thus we can conclude that European Union has managed to overcome its democratic deficit and to secure its position for integration by reinforcing the power and status of European Parliament.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 유럽연합 통합의 현실
 Ⅲ. 유럽연합의 통합상 특징
 Ⅳ. 유럽연합 차원의 통합 진전 노력
 Ⅴ. 결론
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

키워드

유럽연합 유럽의회 민주적 정당성 리스본 조약 유럽연합법 우위의 원칙 조약의 주인 European Union European Parliament democratic legitimacy Lisbon Treaty the principle of supremacy of European Union law Masters of Treaties

저자

  • 김용훈 [ Kim, Yong-Hoon | 서울대학교 통일법센터 선임연구원, 국민대ㆍ아주대학교 강사, 법학박사. ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    원광대학교 법학연구소 [THE LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE WONKWANG UNIVERSTIY]
  • 설립연도
    1961
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    법에 대한 이론적 · 실제적 연구를 수행하고 그 결과를 발표하여 한국과 지역사회의 법률문화의 발전에 기여함을 목적으로 설립되었으며 법학일반이론과 법학교육방법 등의 연구와 법률구조안내 및 상담을 한다

간행물

  • 간행물명
    원광법학 [Journal of Law research]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1598-429X
  • eISSN
    2508-4526
  • 수록기간
    1962~2025
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 원광법학 제27집 제1호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장