Earticle

초록

영어

Art has continuously evolved and site-specific art is one product during this process. Art is site-specific, where the surrounding environment or its location plays an integral role in the meaning and interpretation of the work. Since site-specific art is designed and arranged for particular locations, removal from a specific location arguably mutilates or destroys the integrity of the work.
This article will explores the protection scope and content of site-specific art in the context of moral right, specifically the right of integrity and analyze the relevant provisions of Korean Copyright Act, focusing the problems in Phillips v. Pembroke Real Estate, Inc., which raised the public awareness in the U.S..
Part II will address the meaning and movement of the site-specific art to give a better understanding of related legal issues and 'contextual integrity' which is the cruel clue for solving legal disputes. Part III will cover the legal treatment of site-specific art under Korean and foreign legal systems, focusing on the Visual Artists Rights Act of U.S. Part IV will look into the limitation of protection of site-specific art through VARA and do analysis of the court decision in Phillips and subsequently the future of site-specific art in the wake of Phillips decision. Further this article will specifically consider the right of integrity and its exceptions under the Korean Copyright Act and will conclude with the suggestion for legal alternative.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 장소특정적 미술
 Ⅲ. 장소특정적 미술과 동일성유지권
 Ⅳ. 「장소특정적 미술」의 동일성유지권에 대한 법적 쟁점
 Ⅴ. 결론
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

키워드

저자

• 이동기 [ Lee, Dongki | 국민대학교 법과대학 조교수, 변호사 ]
• 박경신 [ Park, Kyoung-Shin | LL.M. (Intellectual Property), Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law(2007) ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  원광법학 [Journal of Law research]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-429X

• eISSN

  2508-4526

• 수록기간

  1962~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 360 DDC 340