Earticle

초록

영어

This paper analyzes theoretically the leadership competition between China and Japan for hegemony in East Asian regionalism since 1997 Asian financial crisis, using the concept of ‘discursive hegemony’ and examining relevance of main stream international relational theories to East Asian regional order. East Asian states not only have a view of neo-liberal institutionalism in that they recognize the benefits of regional integration and institution for cooperation, but also a view of realism in that they are absorbed themselves in calculating national interests when negotiating regional cooperation. Constructivism is useful to analyze a process of discursive hegemony which competitive leaders attempt to get for winning leadership. China and Japan have competed for securing more potential followers by arousing and satisfying their motives for which two countries have been vying until now, extending membership of regionalism in which Japan is showing preponderance, and endeavoring to beat the competition in terms of norms for regionalism in which China is still superior. Sino-Japanese antagonistic leadership competition is expected to continue for the present and will continue to dissipate any impetus toward regional association.

목차

[국문요약]
 I. 서론
 II. 동아시아의 경쟁적 지역주의 분석 틀
  1. 현질주의·자유주의·구성주의 이론의 타당성
  2. 리더십과 패권
 III. 중·일의 경쟁적 리더십의 전개과정
  1. 물질적 구조
  2. 동기부여를 통한 리더십 경쟁
  3. 동아시아 지역주의의 지리적 범주 설정에 관한 경쟁
  4. 담론적 패권 장악을 위한 규범 경쟁
 IV. 결론
 참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 김유은 [ Kim, Youen | 한양대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  평화학연구 [THE JOURNAL OF PEACE STUDIES]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1738-2580

• 수록기간

  2004~2024

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 340 DDC 320