Fifteen years have passed since local autonomy was reintroduced in Korea. Four mayors directly elected by Seoul citizens served only one term each. This study aims to explore the continuity and change in Bukchon policy over the last ten years (1999-2009), and find out the answer to the following question: Does the new mayor continue or change the former mayor’s policy in the era of local autonomy? This study surveyed official documents, reports and texts of speeches, and interviewed government officials, professionals and resident representatives who participated in the planning and implementation process of the Bukchon policy. The study then analyzed the continuity and change in the Bukchon policy in four aspects: policy status, planning and the legal system, organization and manpower, and projects and budgets. In addition to the literature review, a Delphi survey of the participants in the planning and implementation process of the Bukchon policy was also conducted. The survey analysis showed the following conclusions: First, every time Seoul city has a new mayor, the Bukchon policy is changed because the new mayor had his own will, pledge and policy priority different from that of the former mayor. The goal of the Bukchon policy was changed from preservation of the residential area to invigoration of tourism. The status of the organization in charge and manpower also changed several times. Second, the Bukchon policy underwent many changes after a new mayor was elected. In spite of this, the Bukchon policy has continued as a whole. Although the changes were remarkable at the early stages of the new mayor’s term, the policy returned to its condition, and occasionally, the policy was rather strengthened after the new mayor’s mid-term. Third, although the Bukchon policy continued without interruptions, it was not consistent. Good examples of this include the change in the goals of policy, change of the competent authority from Housing Bureau to Culture Bureau and its return to Housing Bureau, and several changes in the organization in charge. In the era of local autonomy, there is, and will be, a lot of room for change in the Bukchon policy as long as the mayor changes. Accordingly, an institutional framework is needed in order to continue the Bukchon policy and keep it constant. It is necessary to implement the Bukchon policy consistently according to a long term plan which has a legal force, or enact the Bukchon Ordinance that clearly stipulates the goals and basic principles of the Bukchon policy. This should be discussed in depth in further studies.
목차
I. 서론 II. 북촌정책의 수립과 시행 1. 북촌정책의 수립 2. 민선 2기 북촌정책 3. 민선 3기북촌정책 4. 민선 4기북촌정책 III. 북촌정책의 지속과 변화 분석 1. 정책의 위상측면 2. 계획과 법제도 측면 3. 조직과 인력측면 4. 사업과 예산측면 IV. 분석의 종합 및 평가 1. 관계전문가 델파이 조사 2. 종합 평가 V. 결론 참고문헌 ABSTRACT
서울학연구소는 ‘서울학’을 육성, 확산하기 위해 서울 600년을 계기로 하여 1993년 서울특별시의 지원 아래 서울시립대학교 부설로 설립되었습니다.
서울학의 연구대상은 도시 서울입니다.
서울학은 서울의 장소, 사람, 일, 문화를 만들어내고 변화시키는 과정과 힘을 탐구하여 서울이 지닌 도시적 보편성과 특수성을 밝히는 것을 목적으로 합니다. 서울학여느 종합적 관점을 견지하면서 학제적 연구를 지향합니다.
서울에 대한 여러 기성학문 분야(역사학, 지리학, 사회학, 인류학, 경제학, 건축 및 도시계획학등)의 연구관심과 성과가 상호조명되고 교차되는 데에 서울학에 영역이 있습니다.
서울학의 학문적 관심은 오늘의 서울을 만들어낸 역사적 과정을 이해하는 데에 있지만, 그 실천적 관심은 현재의 서울에 대한 심화된 성찰을 통해 보다 나은 서울의 미래를 그리는데에 있습니다.