Earticle

현재 위치 Home

Qualitative Data Analysis Methods of Understanding and Use of Design Research

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국디자인트렌드학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    한국디자인포럼 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    Vol. 27 (2010.05)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.267-276
  • 저자
    최정민
  • 언어
    영어(ENG)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A121550

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

원문정보

초록

영어
Analyzing qualitative data needs a careful approach and the expertise of researchers. Unlike pre-structured and formalized quantitative research, the resulting data of qualitative research is unstructured and jumbled by its nature. Therefore, it is necessary for qualitative researchers to explore analytical methods for analyzing qualitative data. In this study, existing qualitative interview data on the understanding and use of design research in practice were analyzed as a case study. Four interview questions were selected from the initial fifteen items for in-depth analysis and interpretation, focusing more on the interrelationship between answers and the analysis methods. Several existing analysis methods were initially investigated to form a theoretical base, including grounded theoretical methods and case-oriented comparative methods. Based on those methods, this research seeks to examine various analytical techniques
in order to understand the use of design research in practice. The result of the analyses presented several findings of practitioners’ characterization of their own research work, their understanding of design research and research archiving patterns. First, many interviewees
understood design research along the same line with, but in a more broad sense than, their own research work. Second, the characteristics of their real work seem to have an influence on the characterization of their research as well as the relationship between this characterization and their understanding of design research. Third, interviewees who understood design research as a very comprehensive activity rather than just evaluative or method-oriented activity tended to give
more positive answers in archiving their studies. Finally, the limitations of this study and the recommendations for a future study were presented.

목차

Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Scope & Methods
  2.1 Research Scope
  2.2 Research Methods
 3. Qualitative Analysis Methods
 4. Analysis Results
  4.1 Understanding and Comparison
  4.2 Relationship
 5. Discussion and Conclusions
 References

키워드

Design research Qualitative data analysis Analytical techniques

저자

  • 최정민 [ Choi, Jung-Min | 일리노이공과대학 디자인대학 박사과정 / 서울대학교 디자인학부 강사 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국디자인트렌드학회 [Society of korea Design Trend]
  • 설립연도
    1996
  • 분야
    예술체육>디자인
  • 소개
    학술영역의 확대 발전에 따른 다학제적 융복합 학술연구를 통한 시대적 소명을 다함이 21세기 학회 활동의 주요한 키이워드가 되고 있다. 이에 본 학회는 21세기가 요구하는 국내외 디자인 전 분야에 관한 국제교류, 학술 연구활동, 창작활동, 대정부 정책 건의 등의 시대적 소명을 다하고 대한민국 대표 디자인학회로의 재 도약을 위해 가일층 노력하는 학술단체가 되고자 설립되었다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    한국디자인포럼 [Design Forum]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    2233-9205
  • 수록기간
    1996~2017
  • 십진분류
    KDC 658 DDC 740

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 한국디자인포럼 Vol. 27

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장