상호주 판단의 기준시점 및 기준일 제도와의 상호연관성 - 대상판결: 대법원 2009. 1. 30. 선고 2006다31269 판결 -
A Critical Commentary on the Supreme Court Case relating to the Cross-Ownership and Its Voting Right - - Supreme Court of Korea 2009. 1. 30. 2006da31269 Judgement -
Cross-ownership is a method of reinforcing business relationships by owning stock in the companies with which a given company does business. Cross-ownership results when a company owns shares of another company that already holds shares of the company. The vices of cross-ownership include the fictitious increase of capital of the corporation, the control by the incumbent directors without any contribution, and the enhancement of concentration of economic power. Almost every country adapts some regulations over cross-ownership by prohibiting cross-ownership or eliminating the voting rights of cross-owned shares. Record date established by an issuer of a security for the purpose of determining the holders who are entitled to receive a dividend or distribution. Record date also may be established for entitlement to vote or to receive notice of meeting. If such a record date has been fixed, the corporation must prepare a list of shareholders entitled to vote as of such record date. Only a shareholder whose name appears on such list of shareholders is entitled by law to vote. Transferees of shares acquired prior to the meeting but whose name does not appear on the shareholder list will no longer be entitled by law to vote, even if they produce evidence of ownership in timely fashion prior to the meeting. This article examines function and roles of the cross-ownership and its relationship with record date by reviewing the case rendered on Jan. 30, 2009 in Supreme Court of Korea (Supreme Court of Korea 2009. 1. 30. 2006da31269 Judgement). Especially this article focus on the meaning of cross-ownership and its relationship with record date in Korean judicial system. This article is organized in four parts. Part Ⅰoverview the general legal issues which will be raised in next sections. Part Ⅱ described the general description of the Case. Part Ⅲ examines the functions and roles of the cross-ownership and its relationship with record date in the meaning of Korean laws, especially when is the time whether the shares subsidiary have falls under meaning of cross-ownership under the article 369(3) of Korean Commercia Act. Part Ⅳ provides the comprehensive analysis to the case and the direction for the relationship between cross-ownership and record date in Korea.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 사안의 개요 Ⅲ. 상호주 및 기준일 제도의 법리와 상호연관성 Ⅳ. 판례의 평석 Ⅴ. 결론 참고문헌 ABSTRACT
전북대학교 동북아법연구소 [Institute for North-East Asian Law]
설립연도
2007
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
전북대학교 동북아법연구소는 동북아법에 관한 국내외의 이론과 실제를 연구하고 교육하며, 그 결과를 발표하여 동북아법에 대한 이해의 증진과 동북아의 법률문화발전에 기여하기 위한 목적으로 2006년 7월 설립되었다.
서해안시대의 중심지역을 표방한 전라북도의 지리적 여건과 동북아시아의 여러 국가와의 인적 물적 교류가 확대되면서 그에 따른 여러 가지 법률문제가 발생됨에 따라 동북아시아의 지역적 특성을 고려한 법제도의 연구와 이들 국가와 거래하는 전북지역 자치단체와 기업에 대한 실질적 교육의 필요성이 대두되었다.
이러한 요청에 따라 법제도의 연구와 교육을 담당할 기관으로 전북지역 거점국립대학인 전북대학교가 동북아법연구소를 설립하게 되었고 전북 지방자치단체와 기업에 대한 교육과 자문프로그램을 운영하고 있다.