The principle that there must be no crime or punishment except in accordance with fixed, predetermined law, which guarantee function of rule of law in criminal law, is a self-evident principle of criminal justice and at the very heart of many constitution, The Article 12 Clause 2, the Article 12 Clause 3 of the Constitution and the Article 1 of the Criminal Code carry the banner of this principle. In general, the maxim has four important corollaries: penal statutes must be strictly construed, the prohibition or limitation on the use of analogy in judicial interpretation, the requirement of specificity and the prohibition of ambuiguity in criminal legistration and non-retroactivity of law. Although the maxim and its colloraries have now the theoretical basis of criminal law in each country, there is many different opinions about details, the application of the maxim and its colloraries. The existing state of application of the maxim in each country reflects its level of constitutional state, on the other hands, its level of perspectives over criminal law, which theory and praxis of each country have. As a whole, precedent cases come into its own as an playing an important role in realizing the principle of constitutional state in the field of criminal law. Especially, According to increase of the field of special criminal law, precedent cases have regulated definitely the standard of legal control through the deprived principle of specificity and the prohibition of mandatory legistration. But, relating to the prohibition od analogy and retroactivity of law, regrettably precedent cases did not distinguish the interpretation of law from analogy and broaden the range of legal interpretation, did restrict the retroactive application of law favorable to the defendant. Further more, to strengthen the function of the maxim, it is necessary to control the contents of criminal enactments by means of the constitutional principle of proportionality.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 구체적 적용 Ⅲ. 결론 참고문헌 ABSTRACT
키워드
죄형법정주의법률주의위임입법금지명확성유추금지법치국가적 기능비례의 원칙the principle of nullum crimen sine legeprinciple of statutethe prohibition of mandatorylegislationrequest of specificitythe prohibition of analogythe function of constitutional statethe principle of proportionality
전북대학교 동북아법연구소 [Institute for North-East Asian Law]
설립연도
2007
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
전북대학교 동북아법연구소는 동북아법에 관한 국내외의 이론과 실제를 연구하고 교육하며, 그 결과를 발표하여 동북아법에 대한 이해의 증진과 동북아의 법률문화발전에 기여하기 위한 목적으로 2006년 7월 설립되었다.
서해안시대의 중심지역을 표방한 전라북도의 지리적 여건과 동북아시아의 여러 국가와의 인적 물적 교류가 확대되면서 그에 따른 여러 가지 법률문제가 발생됨에 따라 동북아시아의 지역적 특성을 고려한 법제도의 연구와 이들 국가와 거래하는 전북지역 자치단체와 기업에 대한 실질적 교육의 필요성이 대두되었다.
이러한 요청에 따라 법제도의 연구와 교육을 담당할 기관으로 전북지역 거점국립대학인 전북대학교가 동북아법연구소를 설립하게 되었고 전북 지방자치단체와 기업에 대한 교육과 자문프로그램을 운영하고 있다.