Earticle

현재 위치 Home

언어, 번역 그리고 정체성 −베르만(Berman), 베누티(Venuti) 그리고 들뢰즈(Deleuze)의 번역론을 중심으로
Language, Translation and Identity

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국외국어대학교 통번역연구소 바로가기
  • 간행물
    통번역학연구 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제13권 2호 (2010.02)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.121-140
  • 저자
    윤성우
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A117220

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

5,500원

원문정보

초록

영어
Language, Translation and Identity, Interpreting and Translation Studies 13-2, pp. 121-140 Inspired by my own experience of reading and translating a book written by a French translator, Antoine Berman, I am going to suggest my problematics in this paper as follows: (1) Translation is the threshold from which changes of a language begin and a window where the results of such changes show. (2) Therefore, translation provides a vital clue to the issue of nature or identity of a language. (3) After all, the matter of translation is that of language exceeding a level of communication and, at the same time, that of world views or thinking. In the main body, I argue that the issue of identity in language can be divided into two sides in tension; one that regards a language as a fixed invariable and the other that considers a language as a variable or moving. The former is mostly backed by paraphrasers, while the latter is supported by literalists. The former believes that a mother tongue is "untouchable" and communication is the core of a language and translation. The latter reckons that the nature of translation is pursuing changes and expansion of a mother tongue by introducing "the foreign". In this respect, Lawrence Venuti's approach of "foreignazation" and Gilles Deleuze's strategy of "minor language" are definitely worth noting. In conclusion, I agree on Berman's insight that "the nature of translation is opening, dialogue, hybrid and decenterment" and claim that Venuti pursues hybrid, while Deleuze seeks decenterment. As Luther emphasized a strong encounter with the foreign when he translated the bible in German, I insist that a close relation with the foreign texts is required for Korean to take shape.

목차


 Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
 Ⅱ. 본론
  1. 정체성의 문제란 무엇인가?
  2. 언어의 정체성 문제에서 번역의 기능과 역할에 대한 상반된 입장들
  3. 베누티(Lawrence Venuti)와 들뢰즈(Gilles Deleuze)의 입장들
 Ⅲ. 결론
 참고문헌

저자

  • 윤성우 [ Yun, Seong-woo | 한국외국어대학교 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국외국어대학교 통번역연구소 [Interpreting and Translation Research Institute, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies]
  • 설립연도
    1997
  • 분야
    인문학>통역번역학

간행물

  • 간행물명
    통번역학연구 [Interpreting and Translation Studies]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1975-6321
  • eISSN
    2713-8372
  • 수록기간
    1997~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 717 DDC 400

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 통번역학연구 제13권 2호

    피인용수 : 0건 (자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장