The marine boundary and marine pass prohibition in Late Joseon period. Han, Im-SeonㆍShin, Myung-Ho In a traditional period, It has already been existed the recognition of the territorial waters which is not created in a modern period. Traditionally, the term expressing both “open seas” and “territorial seas” was “outside seas”(外洋) and “inside seas”. “outside seas”(外洋) was space prohibiting entry, which existed to the boundary ouside in nations. On the contrary, inside seas was recognized that inner a boundary to concept like the territorial sea. It meas that a border was existing to the sea as there is a border to the land. The borderline was just the horizon coming to Signal fire-millitary visual field. Therefore, the inside seas was a space including distance from Signal-fire to horizon which was recognized to the territorial seas in Late Joseaon period. We cannot say that the range of inside seas was not fixed since the distance from coast to horizon was changed as the height of Signal-Fire, however, according to the calculation, the 40-50km from the coast was inside seas. In the respect of a sea boundary, Maritime Trade Proscription is the law which prohibits not only the horizon but also over the outside seas. It did not mean to forbid people to approach a sea itself. There are two things about the marine pass prohibition in the Joseon period. One is that prohibit to go outside over horizon of the sea and the other is that prohibit to trade centraband goods within the domestic sea-boundary. Maritime Trade Proscription is the opposite concept to Marin Inerchange. In a traditional period, the weaker both Marine Defence Power and Maritime Trade Proscription were, the more the Marin Inerchange was active, on the contrary, the stronger both Marine Defence Power and Maritime Trade Proscription were, the weaker Marin Inerchange was.
목차
1. 머리말 2. 水宗과 해양경계 3. 봉수대에서 水宗까지의 거리 4. 海禁의 개념 5. 맺음말 참고문헌 [논문초록]
동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
설립연도
2000
분야
복합학>학제간연구
소개
동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.