Earticle

현재 위치 Home

연구논문

양성평등을 위한 적극적 평등실현조치의 헌법적 근거마련의 필요성
Necessity to prepare of the Constitutional Basis of Affirmative Action for Gender Equality

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    원광대학교 법학연구소 바로가기
  • 간행물
    원광법학 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제25집 제4호 (2009.12)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.199-228
  • 저자
    이한태
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A115025

원문정보

초록

영어
The Constitution in every nation has Equal Right Clause and it is considered as one of the most important and fundamental rights. In Article 11 of our Constitutional Law, equality before the law is mentioned. And in Section 4 of Article 32, special protection of female labor and in Section 3
of Article 34, female Welfare and elevation of interests is indicated. But throughout history, the social and structural discrimination is endured to women. though the contemporary democratic constitution includes legal protection of equal rights, traditional value-neutral interpretation of equal
rights such as Gender-blindness was not sufficient to embody substantial equality. To solve the problem of the discrimination like this, the gap between legal or mechanical ideology of equality and substantial equality appears to be reduced by ‘gender affirmative action’ in present
discriminatory situations. The effectiveness of gender affirmative action in eliminating
discrimination and achieving substantial equality for women is obvious, but it is double-edged sword with the potential to violate the rights of men since it is a form of inequal treatment privileging the disadvantaged on the one hand, while causing reverse discrimination on the other hand. Affirmative action is an object of dispute in association with reverse discrimination and
merit system. To solve this problem in the interest of social unification, This study
discussed the constitutionality and constitutional limits of gender affirmative action programs in Korea. Finally to settle the problem of the reverse discrimination and unconstitutionality of affirmative action, the preparation of constitutional basis of affirmative action is required.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 평등권 개념의 변화
 Ⅲ. 적극적 평등실현조치의 이론적 배경
 Ⅳ. 헌법적 근거를 마련한 국가의 법제
 Ⅴ. 우리나라의 현황
 Ⅵ. 헌법적 한계 및 헌법적 근거의 마련
 Ⅶ. 결론
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

키워드

평등권 적극적 평등실현조치 역차별 합헌성 사회통합 Equal Right Affirmative Action Reverse Discrimination Constitutionality Social Unification.

저자

  • 이한태 [ Lee, Han-Tae | 충남대학교 법학연구원 전임연구원, 법학박사. ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    원광대학교 법학연구소 [THE LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE WONKWANG UNIVERSTIY]
  • 설립연도
    1961
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    법에 대한 이론적 · 실제적 연구를 수행하고 그 결과를 발표하여 한국과 지역사회의 법률문화의 발전에 기여함을 목적으로 설립되었으며 법학일반이론과 법학교육방법 등의 연구와 법률구조안내 및 상담을 한다

간행물

  • 간행물명
    원광법학 [Journal of Law research]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1598-429X
  • eISSN
    2508-4526
  • 수록기간
    1962~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 원광법학 제25집 제4호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장