Earticle

현재 위치 Home

동사구 생략과 공백화 구문
VP Ellipsis and Gapping Construction

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    21세기영어영문학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    영어영문학21 바로가기
  • 통권
    제18권 1호 (2005.06)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.181-199
  • 저자
    박정래
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A1139

원문정보

초록

영어
This paper examines VP Ellipsis and Gapping in English and argues that the deletion analysis of Gapping is descriptively and explanatorily superior to the movement-based analysis. Also, this study shows that VP Ellipsis and Gapping construction can be explained unitedly by Multiple Spell-out. Johnson(1994) analyzes Gapping as resulting from Across-the-Board verb movement from conjoined VPs. He argues against a deletion analysis for Gapping, based on (i) the fact that Gapping and VP Ellipsis differ empirically, and (ii) a fear that a deletion analysis would falsely give a distributive interpretation of sentence-level negation. This movement-based analysis makes several correct predictions that a verb deletion analysis cannot. It correctly predicts that Gapping constructions require non-correferential subjects and prohibits adjunction of an S-adverb to the second conjunct, which is actually a V rather than CP. Furthermore, the accusative form in the second “subject” can be explained under the movement analysis because the case pattern follows from the fact that the second “subject” is not in [Spec, IP] on the surface. However, several problems against the deletion analysis can be refuted by appealing to a wider range of ellipsis data in light of recent ellipsis research and by being premised on the assumption that elided materials are not V but VP. Besides, the evident proof that Gapping constructions are a PF-deletion is to be confirmed by the Parallelism Requirement attendant upon the contrast focus and the strong feature-checking. However, the leftward and rightward analysis in the deletion approach of Gapping are different from each other when they analyze non-constituents and redundant materials of Gapping constructions. Therefore, Multiple Spell-out by Extended Projection Principle features is presented as a proper alternative to explain VP Ellipsis and Gapping unitedly. This coincides with the economy principle of Minimalism.

저자

  • 박정래 [ Park, Jeong-Rae | 목포대학교 영어영문학과 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    21세기영어영문학회 [The 21st Century Association of English Language and Literature]
  • 설립연도
    1967
  • 분야
    인문학>영어와문학
  • 소개
    영어영문학과 관련된 학술지의 발간, 학술발표회의 개최 및 강좌 개설, 영어영문학 관련 도서 및 자료의 출판, 해외 학술교류 등의 학술연구활동을 수행할 목적으로 설립되었다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    영어영문학21 [English21]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1738-4052
  • 수록기간
    1967~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 840 DDC 820

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 영어영문학21 제18권 1호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장