Earticle

초록

영어

This study examined the characteristics of formative design elements of semi‐up‐style
observed in wedding ceremonies in the mid and late 2000s focused on five elements (parting,
position and volume of chignon, burial and exposure of the ear line, forelock style, and head
pieces, corsage, and various accessories including wig) by comparing them with the
characteristics late 1990s. First, with regard to the type of parting, late 1990s, parting in the middle or combing straight back was popular regardless of face shape, but in the mid and late 2000s, parting was made at the side to produce elegant and refined beauty. Second, with regard to the position and volume of chignon, late 1990s, chignon was raised up to the gold point (G.P) and the top point (T.P) or an excessive volume was given to TP, so it looked artificial and old, but in the mid and late 2000s, chignon was positioned at the nape point (N.P) and back point (B.P), and N.P gave a point volume at around the neckline to produce the feeling of moderation, elegance, and composure. Third, with regard to the burial and exposure of the ear line, late 1990s, the ear line was exposed completely with no consideration of the bride’s face shape, so it looked artificial and old, but in the mid and late 2000s, the ear line was styled in various images including full exposure, partial exposure, and full burial. Fourth, with regard to forelock style, late 1990s, forelock was combed straight back neatly, but in the mid and late 2000s, forelock was styled in various ways including bang hair, medium length, and oblique curl. Fifth, with regard to partial wig and accessories, late 1990s, simply corsage or a partial wig was used uniformly, but in the mid and late 2000s, a partial wig was seldom used and various pieces of different shapes, sizes, and materials were used including corsage, head pieces, and natural flowers to adorn the bride. That is, while up‐style late 1990,s was a classical style that put the hair up to the top, looking unnatural and old, that in the mid and late 2000s was mainly natural semi‐up‐style in
harmony with place, makeup, dress style, etc.

목차

Abstract
 I. 서론
  1. 연구 필요성 및 목적
  2. 연구방법
 II. 이론적 배경
 III. 업스타일비과교 세미 업스타일 비교
  1. 업스타일(Up-Style)
  2. 세미 업스타일(Semi Up Style)
  3. 업스타일과 세미 업스타일의 형태적 디자인 요소 비교
 IV. 결론
 참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 안금희 [ Gum-Hee Ahn | 서경대학교 대학원 미용예술학과 ] 교신저자
• 오인영 [ In-Young O | 서경대학교 대학원 미용예술학과 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  한국메이크업디자인학회지 [The Journal of the Korean Society of Make-up Design]

• 간기

  반년간

• pISSN

  1738-8511

• 수록기간

  2005~2020

• 십진분류

  KDC 593 DDC 646