Despite its importance, it seems that research on legal experts’ legal acknowledge have not been making in-depth progress. Thus, research in this field needs to be made urgently. First of all, in selecting the legal experts, they shall turn actual cases into subject matters, which can be legally judged, by abstracting these actual cases and making them into legal issues. Based on this approach, the legal experts shall be capable of making appropriate conclusions by pondering on the most suitable legal principles. When setting the scope of the survey based on these principles, it seems most ideal to conduct the survey on the experts who have obtained qualifications regarding laws and legal systems. However, considering realistic problems in conducting the survey, it is necessary to limit the subject of the survey to the experts who have obtained qualifications about the law itself.In addition, it is necessary to understand that legal acknowledge means an umbrella concept members of one social community have about the social governance system called ‘the law’. This concept covers legal awareness, legal attitude, and making legal value-judgments and legal appraisals.In conclusion, legal experts’ legal acknowledge can be defined as the general term covering legal awareness, legal value-judgments, legal appraisal and legal attitude of the experts who have obtained qualifications about the law itself, toward the social governance system that the members of one social community consider as the law.Furthermore, reasons why it is necessary to investigate legal experts’ legal acknowledge are as follows: Firstly, to contribute to realistic and early realization of constitutionalism; Secondly, to understand the gap between reality and laws and to indicate the direction toward which adjustments are to be made; and Thirdly, to act as criteria upon which advanced and efficient operation of the legal system is evaluated; Fourthly, to act as the standard upon which effectiveness of the legal system is assessed; Fifthly, to contribute further to a sound constitutional environment or legal climate by legislating, applying and interpreting laws suitable for the social circumstances of Korea. Sixthly, to use as the basis showing problems of legal education and improvements.
목차
I. 서론 II. 법전문가 III. 법의식 IV. 조사의 필요성 V. 결론 참고문헌 ABSTRACT
한국입법정책학회 [Korean Society of Legislation and Policies]
설립연도
2005
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
‘법률’이 그 기능을 발휘하기 위해서는 그 사회구성원들이 ‘법률’을 ‘법’으로서 받아들일 때만이 가능 한 것이다. “나쁜 법률”은 아무리 치장을 하고 포장을 해도 “나쁜 법률”일 수밖에 없고 그러한 '법률'은 ‘법’으로서의 기능을 하지 못하고 사회 구성원들로부터도 ‘법’으로서 인정을 받지 못하게 되는 것이다. 지금까지 우리나라는 매우 많은 경우에 있어서 “나쁜 법률”을 포장하고 치장하여 ‘법률’도 ‘법’이라는 이름아래 사회구성원들에게 ‘법’으로서 받아드리도록 강요하여왔고, 그 결과 이를 거부하는 사회구성원들 사이에 심각한 갈등을 겪어왔다. 즉, ‘법률’이 “좋은 법률”일 경우에만 사회구성원들은 그 ‘법률’을 ‘법’으로서 받아드릴 수 있는 것이다. 한국입법정책학회는 “좋은 법률”만을 만들어야 하는 입법자를 지원하는 것을 그 구체적인 목표로 하고 나아가 ‘법’에 관한 법이론적 연구 및 입법론에 관한 연구를 수행하며 이와 관련하여 철학 및 어학 등 입법과 관련한 다른 영역과도 활발한 교류와 협력을 하여 대한민국의 입법제도 및 입법문화의 형성 및 발전의 기초를 다지고자 설립하였다.