It is often said that ‘Education should be a farsighted national policy’. I’m not sure if this slogan holds good in these days because educational environment is changing so fast enough that we cannot keep abreast of it well. A New Freedom that has swept over the world in this Century shows what the end or purpose of human’s desire is ultimately and demands a forceful adjustment of it. Probably, the New Freedom may be guiding righteousness or virtue of education in so harsh and ruthless way to our contemporaries in the world. Just with the word of ‘competition’ defined nowadaysas a super-ordinate concept to the true aim or object of education such as autonomy and originality, the present educational field is being pushed into competition itself. Education had been originally regarded as a private realm, but with the birth of concept of the State, it would be essential to infuse people with a public aim of the State and to educate them with spiritually unified idea, which gave rise to the concept of public education on the premise that people in the State should be enlightened. Although public education in the past originated from the abovementioned purpose, however, it is not too much to say that everything stems from public education today. The Clause 1, Article 31 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea stipulates that ‘All people shall have a right to equally receive education corresponding to their abilities’. The word of ‘education’ stated in the Constitution refers to public education. And the public education herein includes national, public, and private schools. Therefore, it can be seen that the concept of education in these days guarantees the concept of public education institutionally, while private education may be another realm with which individuals should be charged. The concept of education formed in all these years of transition is still rapidly changing. So the parts to be dealt with in this thesis consist of: (Ⅱ) The relations between the Constitution and Education Act concerning the education right provided for by the Constitution; (Ⅲ) Analysis between education right and learning right followed by the change of subject in education; (Ⅳ) The relations with independence of education considered important in education right; (Ⅴ) The definition and establishment of concepts about ‘Legislation of teachers’ status’ and ‘Faculty reappointment system’ guaranteed in the Constitution. Accordingly, this thesis is to present the true object of education and the future vision of education for the following generations, especially by analyzing the relations between autonomy and self-government of education.
목차
I. 序說 II. 憲法과 敎育法과의 관계 III. 敎育權과 學習權의 관계 IV. 교육의 자주성 V. 敎員地位法定主義와 再任用制度 VI. 結語 참고문헌 ABSTRACT
키워드
System of the Educational ActConstitutionEducational ActIndependence of EducationReappointment System
한국입법정책학회 [Korean Society of Legislation and Policies]
설립연도
2005
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
‘법률’이 그 기능을 발휘하기 위해서는 그 사회구성원들이 ‘법률’을 ‘법’으로서 받아들일 때만이 가능 한 것이다. “나쁜 법률”은 아무리 치장을 하고 포장을 해도 “나쁜 법률”일 수밖에 없고 그러한 '법률'은 ‘법’으로서의 기능을 하지 못하고 사회 구성원들로부터도 ‘법’으로서 인정을 받지 못하게 되는 것이다. 지금까지 우리나라는 매우 많은 경우에 있어서 “나쁜 법률”을 포장하고 치장하여 ‘법률’도 ‘법’이라는 이름아래 사회구성원들에게 ‘법’으로서 받아드리도록 강요하여왔고, 그 결과 이를 거부하는 사회구성원들 사이에 심각한 갈등을 겪어왔다. 즉, ‘법률’이 “좋은 법률”일 경우에만 사회구성원들은 그 ‘법률’을 ‘법’으로서 받아드릴 수 있는 것이다. 한국입법정책학회는 “좋은 법률”만을 만들어야 하는 입법자를 지원하는 것을 그 구체적인 목표로 하고 나아가 ‘법’에 관한 법이론적 연구 및 입법론에 관한 연구를 수행하며 이와 관련하여 철학 및 어학 등 입법과 관련한 다른 영역과도 활발한 교류와 협력을 하여 대한민국의 입법제도 및 입법문화의 형성 및 발전의 기초를 다지고자 설립하였다.