Earticle

초록

영어

In Japan, since 2000 corporations have greatly suffered damages because of illegal acts or misconduct of employees or the management. In result, much emphasis has been placed on
establishment of effective internal control system from the perspectives of corporate governance structure. In the Daiwa Bank case of 2000, the Japanese court held that corporations should establish effective internal control system and, therefore, a director should have a duty to establish and monitor internal control system. As a result of the Daiwa Bank case, the Japanese Government tried to introduce internal control system. In Japan, Corporation Act was enacted and came into effect in 2006. Internal control system is introduced under Corporation Act and Regulation of Corporation Act contains detailed provisions of internal control system. Therefore, large corporations should establish internal control system by the resolution of the board of
directors. A director has a duty of internal control in large corporations. In addition, in 2006 the Japanese Government enacted Financial Products Transaction Act that includes internal control related to a financial report in order to secure confidence of disclosure information in capital market. Furthermore, in 2004 Whistleblower Protection Act was made to improve compliance of corporations and to protect a whistleblower. In the context of the making of transparent corporate governance, it is necessary for corporations to reinforce and improve internal control system in case of Korea. In this connection, a deep study must be studied on the Japanese laws concerning internal control system.

목차

I. 序論
 II. 會社法上의 內部統制制度
 III. 金融商品去來法上의 內部統制報告制度
 IV. 公益通報者保護法上의 公益通報者保護制度
 V. 結論
 參考文獻
 ABSTRACT

키워드

저자

• 丁大 [ 정대 | 한국해양대학교 해사법학부 조교수, 법학박사 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  동북아법연구 [Northeast Asian law journal]

• 간기

  연3회

• pISSN

  1976-5037

• 수록기간

  2007~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 369 DDC 341